"Erpe;15242397" wrote:
"HalloMolli;15242373" wrote:
"Erpe;15242368" wrote:
"HalloMolli;15242332" wrote:
"Erpe;15242316" wrote:
.The link tells me that Gamestar originally gave TS4 77 points because it wasn't as good as TS3 and now said: "Übrigens: Die kostenpflichtigen Erweiterungspakete fließen NICHT in die Wertung von Die Sims 4 ein, die bezieht sich rein auf das Hauptspiel inklusive Gratis-Updates. Was natürlich nicht heißt, dass wir die Erweiterungen ignorieren: Mehr zum Addon Die Sims 4: An die Arbeit und den anderen Paketen gibt's gleich." So Gamestar didn't change the score for TS4 as you claim.
What you quote says: We don't change the score because of eps. That's all. Just please, Stop lying (again)!
Here is the proof:
https://picload.org/image/rddaaddw/score.png
(the score in brakets was the previous score btw)
source: http://www.gamestar.de/spiele/die-sims-4/wertung/49502.html
"auramaris;15242326" wrote:
TS3's packs were full of content
Yeah, they won the numbers game - gz!
Two points up from 77 to 79 ;) Okay you found a newer and better link this time. But look at http://www.gamestar.de/spiele/die-sims-3/wertung/44325.html where Gamestar gave TS3 90 points (their max is 100) already from the beginning. You are fighting a losing game in your blind and ignoring defense for TS4.
Don't forget: Even a (profesional) reviewer can only provide a single opinion about the game. The general reception is what determines success. It's not him or her.
If you compare with other ratings then Gamestar is actually still quite positive.
Gamespot gave the Sims 3 basegame 9 stars out of 10 and only 6 out of 10 to the Sims 4.
Metacritic gave the Sims 3 86 points out of 100 and only 70 points out of 100 to the Sims 4.
So TS4 is rated much lower than TS3 everywhere.
I, myself would have rated TS3 basegame higher than TS4 basegame. Even today (because
potential is not always a criteria).
