Forum Discussion
ChampandGirlie
5 years agoNew Spectator
@Amavari
Respectfully, I disagree with some things that have been said. There was bashing of non-supernatural play in this thread when people said things to the effect of suggesting that all players should be forced to play with supernatural content and should have to mod their games. (Err, I wouldn't buy that game, I'd stop financially supporting it.) I could pick out individual quotes but I won't.
I repeat that I'm not against the release of supernatural content at all but the pressure from some quarters to complain about any pack that isn't perceived as supernatural enough IS something that I take issue with. Yes, I think it would be better if the developers would tell everyone that they'd make the knitting pack and the happy haunts pack given how many people wanted the latter.
Sure, in some hypothetical TS5, maybe they should split it out into different but compatible versions of the same game.
Additionally, toggling supernaturals is also toggling realism if the concepts are opposites. It's the same thing.
"No one is complaining about realistic gameplay," if this is meant to indicate that no one wants anything in the game that isn't supernatural, it isn't a true statement. There are a lot of different players out there who want different things of whom, supernatural players are one contingent. Implying that supernatural players didn't want seasons or pets and that the content in those packs wasn't for supernatural players is something that definitely cannot be generalized.
I'm not interested in an extensive debate, I only spoke up in this situation because as I said before, there are players who want supernatural content, there are players who want to mix realism and supernatural content and there are players who do not want to mix supernaturals with other forms of gameplay broadly characterized as realism.
All realism players are not the same and do not all want the same things. I didn't say that there has been an even release of content but if you count supernatural influences there has been quite a lot of content for that contingent. That does not mean that I'm saying there shouldn't be more, but players who want other forms of gameplay shouldn't be left out or derided for the way that they want to play. If you say that no one was suggesting that, it isn't true.
Anyway, I hope that supernatural players get what you are wanting and I hope that I do too. Thanks.
Also, I like the Middle Ages too. The only reason I don't have a medieval save is that I wouldn't be able to get over the modern elements that are inherent in the game like you've mentioned, they would be too immersion-breaking for me.
Respectfully, I disagree with some things that have been said. There was bashing of non-supernatural play in this thread when people said things to the effect of suggesting that all players should be forced to play with supernatural content and should have to mod their games. (Err, I wouldn't buy that game, I'd stop financially supporting it.) I could pick out individual quotes but I won't.
I repeat that I'm not against the release of supernatural content at all but the pressure from some quarters to complain about any pack that isn't perceived as supernatural enough IS something that I take issue with. Yes, I think it would be better if the developers would tell everyone that they'd make the knitting pack and the happy haunts pack given how many people wanted the latter.
Sure, in some hypothetical TS5, maybe they should split it out into different but compatible versions of the same game.
Additionally, toggling supernaturals is also toggling realism if the concepts are opposites. It's the same thing.
"No one is complaining about realistic gameplay," if this is meant to indicate that no one wants anything in the game that isn't supernatural, it isn't a true statement. There are a lot of different players out there who want different things of whom, supernatural players are one contingent. Implying that supernatural players didn't want seasons or pets and that the content in those packs wasn't for supernatural players is something that definitely cannot be generalized.
I'm not interested in an extensive debate, I only spoke up in this situation because as I said before, there are players who want supernatural content, there are players who want to mix realism and supernatural content and there are players who do not want to mix supernaturals with other forms of gameplay broadly characterized as realism.
All realism players are not the same and do not all want the same things. I didn't say that there has been an even release of content but if you count supernatural influences there has been quite a lot of content for that contingent. That does not mean that I'm saying there shouldn't be more, but players who want other forms of gameplay shouldn't be left out or derided for the way that they want to play. If you say that no one was suggesting that, it isn't true.
Anyway, I hope that supernatural players get what you are wanting and I hope that I do too. Thanks.
Also, I like the Middle Ages too. The only reason I don't have a medieval save is that I wouldn't be able to get over the modern elements that are inherent in the game like you've mentioned, they would be too immersion-breaking for me.
About The Sims 4 General Discussion
Join lively discussions, share tips, and exchange experiences on Sims 4 Expansion Packs, Game Packs, Stuff Packs & Kits.
33,177 PostsLatest Activity: 4 minutes agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 4 minutes ago
- 5 hours ago