If next pack is romance, are you ok with no new world?
if the next pack is romance pack are you ok with the Dev not including new world in exchange with more gameplay content? (Aka seasons in sims 3)
Forum Discussion
"haneul;c-17792885" wrote:"graventhe;c-17792881" wrote:"haneul;c-17792875" wrote:
I don't think we should give up features in advance when the Sims 4 EPs are already very light on features. Sims 3 World Adventures came with a ton of stuff (photography, nectar-making and martial arts skills plus 3 new worlds and a ton of other stuff). The Sims 4 team can just do better with EPs.
I agree, however EA always push developers to finish packs on deadlines and always complain about "not enough budget" sadly i think good old days of sims 3 packs quality is gone..
but if not including new world contributed more to gameplay then it's better in the long run..
If you have all the EPs there's plenty of worlds to pick from, but are there really any good gameplay?
I have all EPs and I like the game, but as the consumer I don't want to encourage them to lower the bar anymore than they already do, because I think we will end up with no world and lackluster gameplay. I also have a lot of mods and given what EA did with Lifestyles and NAPs, I don't trust them to implement an attraction system that's better than the one mods provide already. But Seasons did come with a lot of features I like and no world but I don't see them pulling that off with a romance pack.
If they mess up the attraction system in the romance pack like in NAPs I'll be hella angry lol..
EA better do it like in mods (and the popular +18 mod attraction system) where we can choose eye color and even hair types, body shapes and age for attraction system, if mod creators can do it then so does EA..
