"Aine;c-17257250" wrote:
"SimTrippy;c-17257202" wrote:
And I hope they'll let us Scruberoo the kids at some point.
The fact that they didn't include that just plum me off. Why is so much of this game rage inducing these days? Why can't they just make an effort to make something decent? Always the least amount possible with them, and that's why Kids get the short stick constantly. Their argument is that people don't play with Kids - well DUH if you keep not giving kids anything interesting to do, ofcourse people are gonna play with them less. The mind boggles.
EA: doesn't make kids interesting.
Also EA: well if you don't play with them then what's the point of including interesting things for kids?
Simmers: :o
EA: Why are everyone raging out over kids not being interesting, you don't even play with them?
Simmers: :s
Lol ikr. Plumbella said almost exactly the same thing as you in her RoM review video xD And I agree - don't tell us that we don't play with kids enough if kids only have like 4 aspirations, limited traits, limited interactions, and
very limited gameplay. And, to top it all of, if they're almost
never included in any of the later gameplay additions. Even Parenthood focused more on the adults
parenting their kids than on kids being kids. Which, fine, makes sense given the name, but family play is about the whole family - not just YA sims.
Honestly, I'd be thrilled if they make a "kid's time GP" adding in things like pillow fights, building forts, doing each other's make-up, sleepovers, etc. PLUS a general overhaul to
every other gameplay system they should've been included in from the start, incl. but not limited to Vampires, RoM, and C&D - because, yes, I find kid interactions with pets to also be EXTREMELY limited. I would even pay them for it - even though I feel I already did but well ...
