"Aine;c-17133854" wrote:
"XxAirixX;c-17133812" wrote:
I strongly disagree. Shallow is what you make it. Not like Sims was super deep or had great game play either; but people told stories that gave the game depth. The point of the game is to create sims and stories how you want it or otherwise it would be an RPG.
That's such a bull argument. How can you create stories if there are no gameplay to create with? I'm not playing with barbies here, I'm playing a game that should have content. And the RPG comment is so wrong - previous iterations didn't have these problems we see now, and they were FAR from being RPGs. This pack is not only shallow, it's a complete joke - it's like they went out of their way to cut out things that would have made it decent? I mean, what game dev thinks it's a good idea to NOT have a mermaid transformation animation? There's something wrong or missing with pretty much EVERY feature in this pack - the only thing that is well done is the design. I bet it's because they can't skimp on design, otherwise they couldn't get any good promotional pictures without straight lying. Not they aren't lying anyway - it wasn't fans that was saying that mermaids could indirectly kill sims - it was the gurus. They straight up showed it in the stream and talked about it. For shame!
It's ok to like the pack, but there's no point in pretending it has tons of features or that it isn't shallow and half baked. It's ridiculous.
It is 100% valid and not any more bull than your complaints. If mine is not valid, than either is yours.
There is plenty of game play and the stories is just like every sims game, you decide what they want to do. It has always been that way as it meant to give players control and do what they can't.
I am so tried of this bullying and shaming and no longer backing down. This not the feedback/complaint forum and beyond sick of how you treat Sims 4 and yet conveniently ignore all the problems with Sims 3 or that fact they aren't all that deep on their own either.
