Forum Discussion
7 years ago
"TS1299;c-16392000" wrote:"v12creator;c-16391583" wrote:"candy8;c-16391484" wrote:
I agree with LG I did not buy this pack but I could see that it would be waste of money unless you want new outfits for you cat or dog. The whole Sims 4 really is bad in comparison to Sims 3 over all it is a joke.
Personally i think they are both flawed, Thesims3 has too much content but the sims thenselves are lackluster and the game is a buggy mess, Thesims4 has smarter sims and is more stable but lacks content, both suffer the whole experience due to basegame design decisions (Bad sims/Bad world design) and with constant cash grabs on part of the DLC cycle. Thesims3 with the store and Thesims4 with the stuff packs.
But i personally prefer smarter sims and Gamepacks to Thesims3 simpoints and bigger world even if it has more content so i must disagree and say thesims4 is better but not by a huge leap, honestly Thesims2 is still the better game in general, even with its ugly graphics and closed map.
EDIT : I am NOT buying this pack by the way as i, too,think it is rubbish.
Agreed So much. If there is one thing that bothers me with sims 4 is the lack of Expansion Packs. For me if we had our 7th Expansion Pack Coming right now(if we had two EP Teams) then the game may already had tons of content. Complaints about the lack of content might have been ended, and the game is shaping on the fullest it can be. But instead they chose for some reason to create a SP Team rather than an EP Team.
I think it's because they've changed how they're handling the game overall. I personally think their intention is to make the TS4 run almost twice as long as previous base games and I get the impression that was the plan while they were building the new engine. But they need content to be released regularly and it's a lot easier to get people to buy $10 packs than $40 packs. People may spend $10 on a whim but they aren't going to do that with $40 normally.