Forum Discussion
Suecom
6 years agoNew Spectator
"ClarionOfJoy;c-17137917" wrote:"pepperjax1230;c-17137912" wrote:"Goldmoldar;c-17137897" wrote:Ok but you need to realize this isn't Sims 2 or 3 and it doesn't need to measure up to either game."pepperjax1230;c-17137890" wrote:"ClarionOfJoy;c-17137879" wrote:I see nothing wrong with it and if I wanted Sims 4 to be a rehash of past games I wouldn't have bought it."pepperjax1230;c-17137855" wrote:
So I don't quite understand what is wrong with Island Living?
Read all the posts on the forum that complain about it including right in this thread. You can't avoid it, lol!
That is based on what you think about IL, other people have different ideas and opinions that differs from yours and that is okay.
It DOES have to measure up to Sims 2 and 3 because it's part of the series. They should have made TS4 it's own game. That way it wouldn't have to live up to the previous better iterations.
I agree. It DOES and SHOULD match up with Sims 2 and 3 because it's supposed to be a follow on from those games. Sims 4 is definitely NOT a follow on. Sms 4 changed the criteria right from the outset and right from the outset, in terms of being a follow on, it was lacking. Everyone who has played Sims 2 and 3 already knows that. It's not a belief, it's a fact. EA know it, long time players know it.
Sims 4 is ok as a stand alone game. It's .... ok. But that's it. If I look at it from the perspective of being an extended, better version of Sims 2 or Sims 3, then no, it's not ok. It's lacking.
About The Sims 4 General Discussion
Join lively discussions, share tips, and exchange experiences on Sims 4 Expansion Packs, Game Packs, Stuff Packs & Kits.
33,182 PostsLatest Activity: 38 minutes agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 29 minutes ago
- 59 minutes ago
- 3 hours ago