Forum Discussion
6 years ago
"pepperjax1230;c-17137947" wrote:"Sucom;c-17137929" wrote:Its not lacking you just expect the game to be open world no loading screens. You expect everything they put out to be Sims 3 quality and to be honest Sims 3 wasn't that good. I have more fun playing Sims 4 then I did Sims 3. I had more issues and more game breaking immersive issues with Sims 3. It was so much fun to play and when you come back from vacation in that game to have your 4 generation families family tree all messed up beyond fixing. It was so much fun to have to use mods to fix the problems that game had. That game was a big buggy mess. Also when I do go back to Sims 3 there are things in Sims 4 that make Sims 3 boring now. I am a long time simmer of the franchise I started with The Sims."ClarionOfJoy;c-17137917" wrote:"pepperjax1230;c-17137912" wrote:"Goldmoldar;c-17137897" wrote:Ok but you need to realize this isn't Sims 2 or 3 and it doesn't need to measure up to either game."pepperjax1230;c-17137890" wrote:"ClarionOfJoy;c-17137879" wrote:I see nothing wrong with it and if I wanted Sims 4 to be a rehash of past games I wouldn't have bought it."pepperjax1230;c-17137855" wrote:
So I don't quite understand what is wrong with Island Living?
Read all the posts on the forum that complain about it including right in this thread. You can't avoid it, lol!
That is based on what you think about IL, other people have different ideas and opinions that differs from yours and that is okay.
It DOES have to measure up to Sims 2 and 3 because it's part of the series. They should have made TS4 it's own game. That way it wouldn't have to live up to the previous better iterations.
I agree. It DOES and SHOULD match up with Sims 2 and 3 because it's supposed to be a follow on from those games. Sims 4 is definitely NOT a follow on. Sms 4 changed the criteria right from the outset and right from the outset, in terms of being a follow on, it was lacking. Everyone who has played Sims 2 and 3 already knows that. It's not a belief, it's a fact. EA know it, long time players know it.
Sims 4 is ok as a stand alone game. It's .... ok. But that's it. If I look at it from the perspective of being an extended, better version of Sims 2 or Sims 3, then no, it's not ok. It's lacking.
Sims 3 has it's flaws, but at least when the Sims go diving - you can play those parts out. Sims 4, you just stare and wait until they pop back up.
It is only one world for these activities in Sims 4 - they couldn't even put in actual diving interactions?
And that's after years and years of making these games?
Aren't coding/programming/developing games more efficient nowadays, so that this series should be offering even more options and interactions and tools for the players now, more than ever?
We are actually getting less product wise for the cost than years before AND more bugs to go with it.
About The Sims 4 General Discussion
Join lively discussions, share tips, and exchange experiences on Sims 4 Expansion Packs, Game Packs, Stuff Packs & Kits.
33,185 PostsLatest Activity: 8 minutes agoRelated Posts
Recent Discussions
- 8 minutes ago
- 34 minutes ago
- 42 minutes ago