"Lizzychicago;c-16794475" wrote:
"Octavie88;c-16794323" wrote:
So basically they're implying that the game can't handle any extra worlds of a respectable size any more. Words can't express how much that aggravates me.
I don't thing that's what Kate means at all, I think they're taking into consideration that quite a few Simmers do not have computers that can handle a whole lot more stuff. They're being considerate whilst still giving everyone what they want. So there aren't a lot of lots to build on, it's not the end of the world.
I do not see that as fair - that I put money and work into my pc - I play on Ultra and feel my worlds should reflect that. Why should my game suffer because someone else has a crappy pc? No - they need to reconfigure the system so people with lesser pcs get less lots and sims. Have the worlds and sims reflect the settings your computer is capable of like many games do. It beats the heck out of what other studios do - that simply tell you tough luck if you have a subpar pc to play on - you often cannot play that game at all. What company punishes the player for having a better pc so the cheaper pcs can play the game too. That is not fair at all to us that sacrifice things in life to build a great pc to actually enjoy our games. I save for months before I buy my new components for my next rebuild - I am not rich and on top of it I am not well - but gaming keeps me sane and gives me something to do where as I would be unable to do anything with out gaming and my pc. So I put all I can muster into building the best pc I can - and people don't think I should be a bit angry if I hear my game is less than what I expected because of cheaper pcs.
How is that right at all - if that is the case. It is not right to me and not the way of most game studios. I really do not want to hear that is the cause for the worlds getting less lots for us to play on.
