"Naus;c-16976084" wrote:
"storyy;c-16976055" wrote:
Are you saying that the Sims Medieval offered replayability and was not kind of a huge let-down? Or that Sims Stories had more gameplay than TS4? I loved Medieval, but after playing through once I had very little desire to play through again.
Yes. Medieval's quests have MANY branching paths. Depending on how certain quests ends your realm gains points in Culture, Security, etc. and the level you have in those attributes (aspects) determines which quests you get. The quest to assasinate the Monarch will only appear if your Kingdom's Well-Being goes below a certain threshold, for example.
It doesn't matter if YOU didn't want to play anymore. Medieval has objectively a good degree of replayability.
I agree. I have Sim's Medieval does have replayability. The reason it failed was really because of how it was poorly marketed. People thought it had more of a Sim's 3 vive. Some even thought it was a EP. You couldn't mod it. You couldn't build in it like you could in the sims. It was meant to be a rpg spinoff. I think there was enough quests in it that it had replay value. Its biggest issue was it was not part of the actual Sim's 3 game.
