"Naus;c-16976420" wrote:
"Zeldaboy180;c-16976407" wrote:
I'm not defending what I like, I'm saying the comparison isn't fair. I clarified it more in a later post. A store set compared to a game pack just isn't the same thing.
But world sets and game packs are two wildly different concepts. It's not fair to compare the two.
The point wasn't to compare Lucky Palms and StrangerTown as a whole (though I did add some additional comments since some people assumed that was the point).
I made this post to compare the QUALITY and QUANTITY of the world/premade lots of a world in The Sims 3 versus what we're getting now. I could've used Sunset Valley or Riverview (which is free), but I decided to use Lucky Palms because both are desert towns and both cost around the same (LP is 24.5% more expensive). In that sense I think the comparison is fair, if not for quantity, at the very least for quality and attention to detail. I could've also included walkable space, but people would've said it was extremely unfair (it's also difficult to measure).
Either you look at it, StrangerVille doesn't look like it's worth the askign price given the fact that one of its main selling points is the world (and the reason I ever thought about doing this was because many people were saying they were going to buy it just for the world and PRAISING the world).
Maybe you could edit your first post?
I look at it as, if I like what I see is coming, I buy it. I don't regret buying StrangerVille at all. It is worth it to me!
