"LiELF;c-16978495" wrote:
The reason it cannot be objective is simply because too many factors depend on the personal preferences and priorities of the player, so there is no static "right" or "wrong". You see?
I think you don't know what
objective means in this context. Objective =/= Empirical / Quantitative.
Objective simply means "not influenced by emotions or prejudices." My intention isn't to write a scientific research paper. I can definitely assess both games objectively, i.e. not letting my emotions and prejudices interfere. There will always be a degree of subjectivity, but what matters is that I can look pass my own biases and be fair.
Now, I'll admit the comment that started this whole back and forth, my saying that TS3 is objectively better, wasn't a good argument because I didn't provide good evidence to back up my claim. I wholeheartedly disagree that one cannot objectively determine if one game is better than the other. However, I won't be doing it here for it will derail this thread even more. Perhaps one day....
