New Stuff Pack Coming

"Hermitgirl;c-16362757" wrote:

"Loanet;c-16362754" wrote:

"Hermitgirl;c-16362746" wrote:

"Sk8rblaze;c-16362529" wrote:
Just a reminder, that's $50 dollars total for two packs of the same theme which still have less content than the predecessor entry, whereas The Sims 3 gave you horses, cats, dogs, small pets, a new open world to explore while riding your horse around as in other worlds, tons of new skills to control your pets with, and more.

The Sims 3's version was released in 2011, costs $10 dollars less, and has more content. This franchise is becoming far more of a joke and greedy money grab than ever before.

What did the Sims 3 small pets do? Is it fair to compare content there? Once we get the pack comparisons can be made and worth speculated on. I am certain though if they put a massive amount of small pets into the Sims 4 Cats & Dogs pack they wouldn't be very interactive. I'd rather have them very interactive and pay more. I'm pretty sure I'm gonna like it though.

I'm trying not to pass any judgements for another 24 hours.

Don't worry, I'm sure EA has every intention of pumping money out of us, though.

Well yeah they are a business... I'm a Sims 4 customer. If I can have a hamster that is more than stuck in a cage I want it. I actually have really high hopes for the interaction levels. That kind of work to put into every little creature would take time and effort. I'll pay for that.

THey're a business. They're not a BANK. I've been through this before, that their product is games and therefore they should make good games at a fair price. A price that results in a good gameplay experience while bringing in enough profit to go towards the expansion of the company and resulting in better games, which will make them plenty of money when people buy these better games.

No, I don't want something for nothing. No, I'm not saying that EA should make games at a loss. No, I'm not saying they should work for free.

We should all wait for the trailer before passing judgement.