Forum Discussion
43 Replies
Replies have been turned off for this discussion
- They really should have made more for representation with this. What about the people that bought the packs and still need more appropriate hairstyles to use?
- I don't mind IF the packs also get additional stuff to replace those assets
I don't like it when it seems like packs are spent adding things that get slipped to base game later like dang it just do other stuff for the pack if u gonna do that - Omri1474 years agoSeasoned AceI like that everyone will be getting this hairstyle but the problem with making SP content specifically into base game content is that SPs don't have that much content in the first place so it can really take away from their value.
The biggest example is Perfect Patio that got it's 'big' gameplay object added to the base game (albeit in a different design). - DeKaythePUNK4 years agoLegendI haven't really been updated with this game in a while (like almost a year or more) but really disappointed that they're still doing this. ?
- logionX4 years agoLegendI don't get why they keep doing it, making content free that you charged people for in the past is a nice but very small effort.
I think they should have updated the hair and added some new variants or something, a win-win for both people who don't have the hair and for people that paid for it originally. - It's not nice when some of us paid for it. I pay for dlc specifically because I want more items. But hey, just wait and they will make it free?
- evilyn_374 years agoSeasoned AceSometimes I don’t mind when they move paid content to base game if they’re going to do something with it and expand on it. Like they did with photography or the Calendar.
I for one hope they move the baking skill to base game so that meals can be better categorized but still keep GT meals locked to the EP.
But when it’s stuff like this it just feels lazy. Like they just don’t want to put in the work of making a new hairstyle. - InuMiroLover4 years agoSeasoned AceIt doesnt matter to me if its just a few cas assets, since its gameplay that makes up the focal point for a pack. I dont buy a pack for one or two things unless Im not exactly paying fully out of pocket. Ill just look for cc in that case.
But partial paid gameplay being put in for free? Now we have a problem. - DoloresGrey4 years agoSeasoned AceIt would be okay as long as they tweaked the stuff a little so it at least doesn't look exactly the same! They could have added a few additional curls to this particural haistyle to make the "tails" a little bit longer. I wouldn't be angry. But this is getting out of hand. It really feels like a waste of money. What's the point of PAYING for packs when I can get the stuff a couple years completely FOR FREE?
- Honestly, putting previously paid content in the base game and saying it’s for representation takes away the sincerity of it. They should try to put new hairstyles and such made with base game updates in mind to show they really care for representation (like Moroccan clothes we got). There were few similar topics not long ago and my mind about it hasn’t changed. Paid content shouldn’t be made free, because it just looks bad and is making players feel duped.
About The Sims 4 General Discussion
Join lively discussions, share tips, and exchange experiences on Sims 4 Expansion Packs, Game Packs, Stuff Packs & Kits.33,723 PostsLatest Activity: 3 minutes ago
Community Highlights
Recent Discussions
- 3 minutes ago
- 22 minutes ago