"MasonGamer;c-17260860" wrote:
Yeah they said it was “crossing the line” or “going too far” if they allowed to use magic on children. In the live stream.
And I remember responding “you could afford to cross that line.” Honestly wouldn’t be crossing any line at all.
Using any kind of magic or spells on kids or letting them do it, themselves, is crossing a line. But, correct me if I'm wrong, can't they die via pufferfish cooking? Cuz that's straight up murder xD
"Sindocat;c-17262367" wrote:
"Atreya33;c-17261959" wrote:
If this is your head-canon that is perfectly fine . What I don't like is this head-canon being forced on people who would prefer to tell a different story.
I would like my spellcaster to care for their child to their best ability, which for a spellcaster should be by using magic. Now they are incredibly selfish, using the need filling potion on themselves but denying it to their children. I would like to have the possibility to decide myself if my sims use magic to raise their kids or not instead of the decision being made for me.
And babies can't die in a fire. Regardless of what stories you want to tell. Magic is unavailable to children. That's the game. Accept it, move on, or play something else. Moaning about what isn't is not going to add to anyone's enjoyment of the game.
Why is it that every time somebody has a complaint or concern about this game, there's always someone waiting in the rafters to shut them down?
It's perfectly reasonable to air grievances about a product. It's how companies know what to fix or what to do better next time. And believe me, there is plenty to fix in this pack and in this game as a whole.