"GaiaPuma;13806998" wrote:
"JessicaSimston;13806991" wrote:
"halimali1980;13806963" wrote:
"JessicaSimston;13806927" wrote:
"halimali1980;13806919" wrote:
"JessicaSimston;13806871" wrote:
"halimali1980;13806865" wrote:
"acee313;13806431" wrote:
And to think a Mod for story progression was created, and the modder made it for free, so it seems not really expensive to create... Might be time consuming, but not expensive.
Time is money
More time needed makes it more cost/budget and resourcers
"halimali1980;13806855" wrote:
The question is: Is creating contents for TS4 more expensive than contents for TS3? Did it cost them more to build TS4 than it did to build TS3?
If the answer is yes in both cases then I would say it actually shows be it the graphics, the shape look of TS3 sims and the shallow doll faces. I will believe them if they say TS3 was cheaper.
People who saved up for this excuse of the game deserve it to be complete, it's not our problem if the Sims 3 was "cheaper", not our fault.
I'm not saying it is anybody's fault that TS3 was cheaper, All I am saying that TS3 quality showed it was cheaper.
In your opinion.
This look cheap to you?
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-nVrzb6tmhjM/UpTD0WOeQ9I/AAAAAAAAAms/DqKQGpjiAAI/s640/TS3_Store_World_RoaringHeights001.jpg
http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/sims/images/d/d0/Sunset_Valley_thumbnail.png/revision/latest/scale-to-width/250?cb=20120728142548
The cost and the quality shows more when you look at the sims themselves
If you're referring to the pudding faces, only the defualt options create puddign faces. If you actually mess around with the sliders you can do a lot!
I am sorry to say, your sim is beautiful in your avi but it has pudding face too (no offense, actually you made a miracle to make a nice sim in sims 3).
I don't see the "pudding face". Her sim has some nice contouring around the mouth, and I can see the cheekbones.
It's not a miracle to make a nice sim in 3, you just have to actually try. -God forbid though.
