"MidnightAura;c-16379305" wrote:
"PugLove888;c-16379222" wrote:
"Ravager619;c-16368045" wrote:
I didn't mind the store. At the time, I had the disposable income since I had paid off my car loan and student loans at the time. But with TS4 I love how we're getting more for our money.
As for the outrage on the forums, what I don't understand is where was the outrage when Toddler Stuff came out? There was so much of it here when they weren't in the game in the first place. Then, we got toddlers. After that, we got the Parenthood GP. But what happened when Toddler Stuff came out? Crickets.
That's why I'm NOT in support of this current outrage.
I agree, @Ravager619 ! Especially since EA could have had us pay to get toddlers! (Many people thought that was why they weren't in the base game to begin with.) But they didn't charge us for toddlers and the toddlers were much better than they were in TS3, yet many people seem to have forgotten that and are berating EA as if EA was charging money for the air we breathe! :( I have enjoyed all of my EPs, GPs and SPs. I will certainly be getting My First Pet! <3
@ everybody, I do understand that some Simmers won't be buying this pack because they feel that this isn't a good deal or they are getting ripped off, etc. That is your prerogative. :) My prerogative is that I think the stuff looks cute and I think the price is fair, so I will be buying it. ;)
On the flip side, so many people complain that EA is "greedy". Maybe they aren't or maybe they are, but I've seen many greedy Simmers who think everything should have been included in the base game! They think that whether, pets, playable jobs, college, and more should have been included. Please let us not forget that greed can run both ways! :#
But what ever you decide to do, Happy Simming! <3
If they had charged for toddlers people would have been upset because they are base game content. Plus would have been difficult for future packs because some people would have toddlers and some wouldn’t.
I don’t agree that weather and pets should be base game either. I actually don’t even agree that the rodents and disease should be free. They should be in cats and dogs or part of a game pack. I would like those things in my game.
I just don’t support the idea they are being split up with a lot of re coloured items and pet suits which have no use to me. Those should have been in cats and dogs or free. They are recolours.
Enjoy though the pack.
@MidnightAura , I understand that you want to get what you feel is the best value (who doesn't?!?) But if all of those items had been included in C&D, we would be missing other items. They can't include everything they think of and still stay in business. I'm not upset at a recolor since we don't have all the colors and patterns I want . (some people pay modders to recolor items for CC in their game anyway). Besides, not everything is a recolor ... the new hair is not and most of the pet costumes/clothing aren't either. ;) Besides, when this pack was announced they called the items that
were recolors "pet prints" which is
exactly what they are. Its not like they promised "totally new shaped clothing". ;)
