The I'm Bored Thread
I don't think I'm the only one. I would like to hear from others like me who are bored with the game and or the entire franchise. I think my boredom is starting to spill over into the entire franchi...
Forum Discussion
"ApparentlyAwesome;c-17372207" wrote:
@Cinebar It sounded to me like they're enquiring about adding depth and more detail to all these things and in a way it's an obvious "no duh" thing. It's only what some of us have been asking for from the start, including some players who love the game. To me, most of those things already done were done just okay enough to skate by instead of taking them and going in depth like they could've and should've. Then add poor personalities and it makes things worse.
Part of the reason this game has had potential for so long is I think to exactly what you've pointed out. They have these things already. The elements for the game to be something great are there, if only they'd take it and do something great. And these shouldn't (and hopefully won't) be something players would have to pay for, these should've been updates steadily added over the time Sims 4 has been out. Or better yet, they could've held off on releasing the base game and improved it. Now they're talking about possibly polishing up packs too and that, if done, should be a free update thing as well or better yet, again, they could've taken their time and improved the quality before releasing them.
Speaking of taking time to improve quality, the lead designer for the new Tiny Living pack tweeted this:
https://twitter.com/SimGuruMrE/status/1082809609050443776
And then this:
https://twitter.com/SimGuruMrE/status/1082809771042852865
I'm glad both had responses that said something similar to what I was thinking.
For the first one, where is the quality?
And for the second, my concern is the quality of what they bring to the table. I don't mind it taking more time if they add to the scope and I know it'll add to the cost too but if they do the game right they'll get that money back and more from loyal and happy customers.
In regards to the first tweet showing the triangle. As I said in another thread TS4's mistake is forgetting TS2 and TS3 exist. And we know better. This only proves to me they want to build the cheapest game possible (without any depth like in 2 or 3) for the most profit. Nothing wrong with that, I guess, but don't expect the fanbase that know the others exsits to cheer them on. What did he actually say with his little example: It's too hard and too expensive.
Featured Places
