"invisiblgirl;c-17272778" wrote:
"Horrorgirl6;c-17270146" wrote:
"PlayerSinger2010;c-17270058" wrote:
Paralives can try all it wants, but the game looks horrible aesthetically.
I think paralives look okay.Its still early in production.So we don't know the final design is going to like yet.Even if the characters dont look high tier.So what ? We play a game to play a game to play. Not to look at a picture.If paralives have good features like the whole altering bed thing.Than I can give it a look
Personally, I want decent graphics. I was very happy to leave S3 and the pudding faces behind. (And that was a big deal at the time - Pescado named his entire S3 section 'The Pudding Factory'.) I want game play, too, but games like Stardew Valley have no appeal to me as life simulators because they don't look like real life.
That said, I don't think Paralives looks horrible - it has improved from the earliest screenshots - but I'm not jumping on that bandwagon until it shows the AI. Being able to manipulate the size of objects, while useful, isn't game play. AI is game play.
I guess preferences I like sims 3 designs better than 4.The Sims midlevel look awesome.As for your other point it's too early to tell what the graphics are like.
