Forum Discussion
HopeyStarr
7 years agoSeasoned Ace
My issue is why can't a certain amount of content make it into these expansion packs? From what I've been reading around there are cuts here and there so that the developpers can focus on a particular aspect of the pack more, but isn't it better to have quality over quanity? In other words, I personally wouldn't mind waiting longer for completed packs for the price that they are. Or would adding more somehow raise the price, using Cats and Dogs as an example. And if so, why?
I'm trying to take into account the time and effort and money it takes to develop content. Seeing as many customers have an issue with quality EA should seriously consider slowing its roll down and allowing developers to pour more time into eps. Cover as many bases as they can. Get more out of feedback. Idk. Maybe trying to meet the deadlines is catching up to the team.
I appreciate the expansion team adding new things like Vets but if time was an issue they really should have been given more so we dont have unnecessary add-ons.
Edit: grammar
I'm trying to take into account the time and effort and money it takes to develop content. Seeing as many customers have an issue with quality EA should seriously consider slowing its roll down and allowing developers to pour more time into eps. Cover as many bases as they can. Get more out of feedback. Idk. Maybe trying to meet the deadlines is catching up to the team.
I appreciate the expansion team adding new things like Vets but if time was an issue they really should have been given more so we dont have unnecessary add-ons.
Edit: grammar