"Scobre;c-17350718" wrote:
"JoAnne65;c-17350526" wrote:
Must confess I lost faith though. Every time I see players stating they play the old games and then return to Sims 4 because it looks so much prettier and you can throw around rooms, I feel this is a lost case. Paralives is my only hope for the future.
Other games do look prettier though. Frontier games for example not only have advance tech with game play but their games are very stunning to view too. There are other games like Become Human Detroit that have advanced not only the look of furniture, but weather and characters and interactions as well. I feel like EA as a company is starting to become outdated with their tech for all their games.
Well absolutely. And in my case, maybe I’m blind lol but I actually prefer the looks of my Sims 3 game to Sims 4 (I do play on highest settings). And the way my sims look and the world they live in isn’t unimportant to me, it definitely contributes to the fun (which is why I fear peanut heads in Paralives ;)). But I’m under the impression the looks have become the main quality barometer for both creators and players, and that for me is a really sad development. Like someone stating they preferred Sims 4 closed neighborhoods to an open world because it provided more detail in the neighborhoods that way. They must mean the paint added by the creators, because I can change and add a lot more details in the open worlds of the predecessor. Now, that argument, ‘look how beautifully they painted the backdrops and suggest an amazing world’, (though I fully appreciate and understand it enchants people) is wasted on me.