EA often enjoy gaining large profit in timing manner, I know I don't like bug here and there, problem is that sometime EA might fire, layoff, or old programming quits, retire, then new programming taken over and not know what is going on, and likely not sent lot of time to seach and explorer what was issues cause bugs as time went by, EA felt's not making profit, to EA less time, more money is good while seached, improved, bug fixed cost the other way around more time and cost more money might be good for gamer but bad for EA, unfortunately, cost more time, less money for EA.
I like playing vampires, but I'm not happy they didn't fix 100% for long time and science career lots' garden is mess up, it's was fine any plant growing when it's come out, but somehow or somepoint later, it's not working rights, all plants is drying, not growing, you can't even water at all at science career, they hadn't fix for very, long time. I wonder if we able to pay or gave money to EA to willing sent more time fixing game? It's very questionable, a double edged sword, it's could motive EA willing to spent more time fixing rather than left other game broken like common, or it's could be EA abuse that or any company would done that.
When something add new stuff, sometime new stuff get in old way and mess up from there or something like that, I could be wrongs.
Nice to had win-win for everyone, not one side
