delete

There are the Vet servers, with no fortress and there was the Speedserver which seemed like a small world with a badge only for 1st place. They have been tried.

Vet servers were going to be 'switched off' at the end of the season, but that hasn't happened so players keep on going even though they get no reward.

Not everyone plays to win a badge, some just like the friendship it provides and play to have fun.

It would be interesting to have the VP points apply to a normal world, true. I've suggested in the past a non-POI world and also multiple hub rings where the an inner set and an outer set need to be held with multiple bases from players allowed on the outer ring.

An alternative could be the outer ring and the inner ring held by 2 allied alliances, effectively 'normalising' what already happens with 2 (or more) alliances working closely together.

Hiy chad, like 38490258923592583 ago it was suggested just to make alliances consist of a bigger number of people, say 100 or 150. If 2 or 3 alliances can work together what would be the problem to have them all in a single big alliance? That's so that there's only 1 "World winner". Would probably have to rework POI "mechanics" dunno, that'd be up to them to try out but it's not like... heck, they are still struggling to improve the message system (if we pretend they have ever touched it).

"gamerdruid;c-1864691" wrote:

Not everyone plays to win a badge, some just like the friendship it provides and play to have fun.

People can still enjoy their freandship and all and have fun on a 1-badge world.

delete

delete

delete

Would like to see ea stoping guys that have badged, dictating, if your are allowed to hit fort for 1 reason or another. Personaly i have been put of the game now as its happening most servers now. After fort hit they simply get another code play god as to who goes next and are 2 strong to do anything , surley would make game more interesting and more lucrative for Ea if this is stopped

Regards Jamie

"jamiepaton5691;c-1867766" wrote:
Would like to see ea stoping guys that have badged, dictating, if your are allowed to hit fort for 1 reason or another. Personaly i have been put of the game now as its happening most servers now. After fort hit they simply get another code play god as to who goes next and are 2 strong to do anything , surley would make game more interesting and more lucrative for Ea if this is stopped

Regards Jamie

Agreed it's ridiculously dictatorship ruled after the badge winners say who does and don't get a go .. and what's galling is the same players make damned sure their ALTs get it next !!!


Needs to be sorted ..

And don't say what about the funds put in .. it's personal choice ... But game has ended for them there so that's it for them ..

In other games once you done it .. shouldn't be a second bite at the cherry once fort killed !!!

And don't say what about the funds put in .. it's personal choice ... But game has ended for them there so that's it for them ..

but the game hasn't ended for them, that is the point. They continue to fund heavily well beyond the fortress kill.

In a soccer game you don't take off a player from a side that has scored a goal and make that side play with 10 and if another goal is scored then play with 9 and so on to give the other side a chance.

"gamerdruid;c-1868042" wrote:

And don't say what about the funds put in .. it's personal choice ... But game has ended for them there so that's it for them ..

but the game hasn't ended for them, that is the point. They continue to fund heavily well beyond the fortress kill.

In a soccer game you don't take off a player from a side that has scored a goal and make that side play with 10 and if another goal is scored then play with 9 and so on to give the other side a chance.

Yes But and a big but .. many alliances DONT ALLOW THE NEXT TO GET A GO !!!


I DONT THINK YOU GET IT !!;

Sigh!!!!!