End Game Outlook
Due to the large issue of glitches throughout the many servers, and not to mention the bullishness of after a fortress has been completed. I would like EA to consider ( and even develop of a vote ar...
Forum Discussion
"gamerdruid;c-1989309" wrote:
If it was economically sensible for them to close servers then they would be doing so. There must be enough life left in all servers to cover costs - as stated, EA are in it to make money so wouldn't keep a dead server (in terms of play) alive without a cost/benefit look.
We, as players can't do that analysis as we have insufficient data.
I have a question about those worlds where there are few players left. Is it feasible to just 'merge' the world so as the last few players in the old Eco worlds have more people to play with? I mean all active players in olds worlds gets relocated to a near empty server that has forgotten bases scattered here and there. There won't be enough frgotten bases to cover territory. All we have are players from various worlds complete with all their bases, resources and RP. If two bases spawn next to each other, both will be destroyed but they will not lose their resources nor require repair time.
