End Game Outlook
Due to the large issue of glitches throughout the many servers, and not to mention the bullishness of after a fortress has been completed. I would like EA to consider ( and even develop of a vote ar...
Forum Discussion
"gamerdruid;c-2054187" wrote:
A nice idea - although I doubt it is possible on existing worlds.
First thing to try is to have in the PTE, maybe a lvl 30 fortress and a few hidden bases on the edge of the world. I left out last time due to the fact it was a mistake for me to bring an alt.
"gamerdruid;c-2054281" wrote:
You can have your own end of game at any time, by leaving a particular world. This is a king of the hill war game, if you don't like it then don't play it and don't spend money on it.
The only End of Game that is certain is that when EA decide it costs more to maintain the servers than they receive in revenue it is time to pull the plug!
King of the hill? So the best players control the center... I wonder if it's even possible to invert the scenario and see who's the fastest to reach the edge of the world. Lets say we spawn in the center and there's no fortress. Bases are here and there in such a way, that you can win if you dig your way back to the edge. The base levels are also inversed, so near the center are lvl 12 bases, and at the edge are lvl 60.
That 2nd statement is definitely the scariest comment I've seen. The last thing I want to go back to the community only to realize its already dead. All the servers taken down and the TA forums entirely removed. I bet the cost for such a tragedy are the servers with 50 to 100 players left playing. I mean per year, EA gets to maintain a additional 5 barren servers (One where the players won't be spending money on). Keep this up and TA may be too risky to maintain and old (and possibly new) servers could start a permanent shutdown. EA should really do something will all those barren servers.
