Solved
Firestorm 24. Could you explain...?
What does "....will not face the forgotten..." mean?
There's no bases, or fortress?
All PvP?
Or some new enemy?
All *wispers* infected...?
Ok its a no forgotten attacks server...
Forum Discussion
14 Replies
Ok its a no forgotten attacks server...
Do you know what the uprising ruleset is?
@GadoviMP wrote:Do you know what the uprising ruleset is?
Not sure.
I noticed the forgotten reacting to a strategic trigger causing then to deploy around a player.
I cannot be sure of the trigger but do notice periods of no activity then very active periods, even when not near tunnels.
Done all I could here.
Its kind of going backwards anyway.
I'm done.
Me too.
I'm done
As in done playing.
It seems like the goal is, and forgive me for being harsh in this post but the threat of restricting players and the resurrecting of the old forums as an attack on the community?
Now hear me out....
All this has happened several times in the past and was even described as "the nuclear option" by mods at one time. I don't understand the motivation once again for any of this.
So I just assume call it quits.
- @merloer114 Resurrecting old forums! How is that a threat?
The closing of the Vanilla forums and move to AHQ was a step to getting all EA games on the software base for forums. Other games moved too. The move to new forums from AHQ is the next step, one planned for all EA games eventually once the bugs are found by keen users of the forums. I don't understand how this is a threat, can you explain?
Restricting players! In what way are players being restricted?
Yes, EA are re-interpreting their own rules which have always banned multi-accounting (or alts) by actually acting upon their rules and enforcing them. Long term players have always known that multiple accounts were 'not allowed' and also that at any time the rule could be enforced. Multiple accounts by one player has been tolerated when they were simply used to play both NOD and GDI on the same world but what we see now is whole alliances made up of multi-account alts used to subvert the playing of the game by others.
@gamerdruid wrote:
@merloer114Resurrecting old forums! How is that a threat?
The closing of the Vanilla forums and move to AHQ was a step to getting all EA games on the software base for forums. Other games moved too. The move to new forums from AHQ is the next step, one planned for all EA games eventually once the bugs are found by keen users of the forums. I don't understand how this is a threat, can you explain?
Restricting players! In what way are players being restricted?
Yes, EA are re-interpreting their own rules which have always banned multi-accounting (or alts) by actually acting upon their rules and enforcing them. Long term players have always known that multiple accounts were 'not allowed' and also that at any time the rule could be enforced. Multiple accounts by one player has been tolerated when they were simply used to play both NOD and GDI on the same world but what we see now is whole alliances made up of multi-account alts used to subvert the playing of the game by others.No I won't.
Im calling it quits too.
Learned some things.
And I hope the devs make something more of TA it has a good base..
As to why the split? It's all there.
So as I'm leaving....".......Not If I See You First" and have fun.
@b97cbae3213388ee wrote:Done all I could here.
Its kind of going backwards anyway.
I'm done.
OK.
Following.
Treat your units like you want to be treated.
Don't let people tell you what your forces are actually doing.
Out.
