Forum Discussion

diplo3's avatar
diplo3
6 years ago

lack of transparency

news of the possible scandal on upcoming WCS spread to every server in chat.most dont do the forums here. while i know nuubal a decent guy i know many wont be going to WCS if there is any hint of impartiality. so i predict the winner now , same as last one LMAO....
  • Shinerplunderer's avatar
    Shinerplunderer
    6 years ago
    With all that accusations, I would suggest the developers and moderators treat every member equally. By means of equally, no favoritism and allow everyone a chance to win at the WCS. Which ever the rule-set for the WCS is, I would like to see the world having access to one alliance. Either your in it, or not. It would comprise of all (if not, majority) the players and there would be at least 5 CiC's, and other ranks are 1%, 5% and 15% of the entire alliance. So if there are 10,000 members, there will be 100 SiC's, 500 Officers and 1500 veterans.
  • gamerdruid's avatar
    gamerdruid
    Hero
    6 years ago
    Keep the comments on the transparency (or lack of) to the existing thread.

About Tiberium Alliances General Discussion

Talk with other players about what is going on in your Command and Conquer: Tiberium Alliances game.1,166 PostsLatest Activity: 5 hours ago