Forum Discussion

peadawg's avatar
6 years ago

New World

Although redmatch went about it the wrong way, he isn't wrong in asking the question about new world starts. Was a time when multiple worlds were starting to give people options, now the worlds are smaller, starts farther apart, and the same alliances finish one and jump to the next. There is one "undecided" world at the moment T42, and I use quotes because red and blue will combine.

Unless the powers that be are cutting costs and only hosting on one server, any reason multiple worlds aren't starting or more worlds more often? I can't believe it takes any more compute power to host another world(s). The $$ is still the same as people are still going to buy funds, probably even more profitable if they can stay on a competitive world longer.

Go back to larger worlds, more worlds, more options.

9 Replies

  • If, as you state, it's the same teams winning most worlds, how would a bigger world change that? The first few 100 players join and the world is decided! A lot of empty space and a longer time to reach the centre but no gain for players or EA as far as I can see.

    I support the request for 'different' worlds with 'different' features aka options. However, we've had many threads with suggestions for these different worlds and not many have been implemented as changes.

    Maybe a large Firestorm world with Malus and Forgotten attacks, a higher start (and cap) for the player and forgotten bases (as is being 'tested' on the PTE) and a much higher fortress with a lot of water, much more than any worlds so far, would be different enough!
  • I've not moved anything into any threads, simply responded as a sometimes player.
  • Small worlds are ok, but the frequency of them is not. I suggest releasing 2 per month, with FG attacks and with or without malus. For players who still like classic worlds, i also suggest 3 large classic worlds per year. It should be enough for everybody.
  • Instead of satellite codes, have nuclear launch sites instead. The reward for sitting on them is a nuclear attack option that can take out any 10 x 10 area of your choice. This will liven up wars...
  • "gamerdruid;c-2110123" wrote:
    An interesting idea - but not really on topic.


    There has been no game development for about 5 years so I wouldn't hold my breath for anything...




  • jbl3ck's avatar
    jbl3ck
    New Spectator
    6 years ago
    stop begging for fresh starts...
    if u sucked on the current server, u'll most likely suck on the next one too.

    better start asking for a private server... u'll definitely win there!

    the game isn't a sprint... it's almost a marathon.

    u're like those people who think that the response to a real world crisis is printing more bills.
  • do one with no scripts an no upgrades..change pvp back to original.an let noobs .feel the true power.oldschool

About Tiberium Alliances General Discussion

Talk with other players about what is going on in your Command and Conquer: Tiberium Alliances game.1,342 PostsLatest Activity: 2 days ago