Forum Discussion
gamerdruid
2 years agoHero+
@F1jjYR3 I agree, there are players who are very successful with NOD armies and not with GDI
There are players who are very successful with GDI armies but not with NOD
There are players who are players who are extremely successful with both!
Of course, there are players who are successful with neither.
A skillful and successful player adapts to the strengths and weaknesses of their own army and the forgotten defences. Also, the strengths and weaknesses of opposing alliances.
The game is so old now that major changes of any kind are highly unlikely, it is now mainly tinkering on the edges of the game and correcting bugs.
There are players who are very successful with GDI armies but not with NOD
There are players who are players who are extremely successful with both!
Of course, there are players who are successful with neither.
A skillful and successful player adapts to the strengths and weaknesses of their own army and the forgotten defences. Also, the strengths and weaknesses of opposing alliances.
The game is so old now that major changes of any kind are highly unlikely, it is now mainly tinkering on the edges of the game and correcting bugs.
F1jjYR3
2 years agoRising Vanguard
Strategic success and failure does drive the experience. As for major changes? The changes I do notice are in responsiveness and feedback. Platforms tend to keep their core concepts intact and change their transparent structures to exploit new technologies.
About Tiberium Alliances General Discussion
Talk with other players about what is going on in your Command and Conquer: Tiberium Alliances game.1,345 PostsLatest Activity: 6 hours ago
Recent Discussions
- 6 hours ago
- 2 days ago
- 3 days ago
- 16 days ago