"gamerdruid;c-2203241" wrote:
This is not a chat room and EE_Elpheterion doesn't monitor these forums constantly so giving a running commentary isn't going to solve any perceived problems or issues.
There are official ways to complain about a player in-game, use that method. It does work if enough players make a substantiated complaint.
I've looked into world FS15 and I see mainly players which are generating high 30's camps at the centre of the conflict - an indication of their army strength. Bases are mainly in the 20's but sitting in a Forgotten area of around 43+
Claims that a base can't be attacked need to be backed up with screen shots that actually say that and preferrably with shots that also show the defence levels. I can't see that type of information as my account is a normal player account so I can only see what a non-member of alliances at the edge of the world can see.
Remember however that this is a forum not a chat room!
I really don't understand why you would make such a statement gamerdruid. This forum is the only real communications channel we have with the developers. What you call 'running commentary', I would call multiple confirmations of the problem and attempts at substantiation. I can completely understand the frustration and anger of the players with this issue and telling people you need real 'proof' of the problem is a slap in the face insult to the players reporting this issue. It comes out like you don't believe their complaints and think they might be faking explanations of proof with phoney screenshots?
