Forum Discussion

BLCarden's avatar
BLCarden
Newcomer
6 years ago

Support weapon rule change

The patch where SW use is limited under the bubble has fundamentally changed the game. If you wish to offer that as an option for another world and leave the present worlds as they were it would meet most preferences.
I do not think it appropriate to make such fundamental changes for a world in play.

19 Replies

  • 123wellz's avatar
    123wellz
    Rising Traveler
    6 years ago
    I'll add another thumbs down to that new support weapon rule - again a couple of people crying get a change put in that most seem to oppose
  • im not impressed with this change either, TBH why not just remove all support wpns if you wish to lvl up the game. also bring back the increased res amounts for killing bases like it used to be!!

    on T13 we have been fighting for over 4 years, we have not complained about support wpns making the game hard for us , we have used different tactics to gain goals there, so if players are so incapable to form tactics to play the game , dont dumb it down to suit them , give them a C&C for 5year olds or younger with fluffy animals ect.
    the majority of the adults here love the game , spend money on it too,

    also we dont mind when some changes are made , which make sense and help the game to be better/ stop types of suspected cheating or cheats.

    im sure this subject will keep you all busy for some time as im sure players will keep posting here with there thoughts on this change.
    regards Tommo
  • hi all
    whats the latest on this subject and will there be a full discription of the changes posted at some point soon?
    HH
  • "hellhound2222222;c-2145238" wrote:
    hi all
    whats the latest on this subject and will there be a full discription of the changes posted at some point soon?
    HH


    The current changes are in the latest patch log. We will wait and see how the PVP meta adapts and make changes based on that, if necessary.
  • thanks for the quick reply, where would i find the "patch log"?
    cheers HH
  • After a few weeks of silence, can you now assume that the rule change will not be reversed?
  • "xxDiginsxx;c-2151284" wrote:
    After a few weeks of silence, can you now assume that the rule change will not be reversed?


    Right now there are no plans for changes to this feature.
  • since this change i have seen a drop off of players on some worlds where wars had been going on, it seems to be a biassed change. and has affected the game play quite a lot in a war situation and not for the good.

    this is ment to be a war game and a surprise attack is a great part of any war situation and being able to protect such a base/ acct doing this is now totally lost and to me the game is suffering now more than ever.
    i started playing when W63 was still quite new, so i have seen the changes in the game over the last few years and understood the reasons for past changes to the game , but with this change i am a bit stumped

    could someone please explain the reasons for the change to the support wpns and how it is ment to improve the game or why it was done , as most of us here still are in the dark as to the purpose of this change and what problem/ issue it was ment to solve.

    a proper and good explanation is in order please

    cheers HH
  • "hellhound2222222;c-2160767" wrote:
    ...
    a proper and good explanation is in order please

    cheers HH


    @EE_Elephterion fully explained it in this very thread;


    "EE_Elephterion;c-2141772" wrote:

    This is indeed a bug, we are looking at it right away.


    "EE_Elephterion;c-2151971" wrote:


    Right now there are no plans for changes to this feature.

About Tiberium Alliances General Discussion

Talk with other players about what is going on in your Command and Conquer: Tiberium Alliances game.1,342 PostsLatest Activity: 8 hours ago