@EE_kalyn2 questions:The screenshots are cut off from the bottom, so not very clear. Also the defense layouts are missing. 1. Could you post the full cncopts or screenshots with defense layouts seen?( I managed to find the first one (World 100 starting layout)https://spy-cnc.fr/CNC/bi/cnclv/layout/afMQ )2. Please clarify if morale setting going to be +4 or +7 ?+4 is basically unplayable, hope you do not have to change settings after the server starts

I think 4 morale is the best setup, we don't want to be finished in 3 months. normal worlds are hard but WCS is easy? does not make sense

Out of curiosity, are 4 and 7 malus the only options, or could it be somewhere in between, like 5? Because 7 malus was designed for Forgotten Attacks worlds, since having to build high defense on bases instead of putting all crystal into your army already slows the world down. So high malus + FA would make the world take too long. But if there are no Forgotten Attacks, 7 seems like it would be too fast. Also, 7 is not high enough to prevent multi-accounting, the malus needs to be higher to really reduce the effectiveness of this tactic.

Agree, 7 malus is too low making it an alt-exploit haven. We all know what happened last WCS. Most of the community came together to boycott the server. A 5 morale setting will make it difficult to use alt exploits while allowing players to move to the center a little faster compared to 4.

@EE_kalyn As the game itself is coming to an end and this will probably be the last WCS people will play, please can you arrange for the winning team to have a POI named after them. Thank you.Maybe go for the Uranium.

The game is a bit more resilient I think and the general environment is healthier than in the past. And as a result i suspect participation is up recently.I think it will stick around for a while.

WCS discussion | EA Forums

b97cbae3213388ee
Seasoned Newcomer
2 years ago
"Sniper2647;c-2234244" wrote:
Out of curiosity, are 4 and 7 malus the only options, or could it be somewhere in between, like 5? Because 7 malus was designed for Forgotten Attacks worlds, since having to build high defense on bases instead of putting all crystal into your army already slows the world down. So high malus + FA would make the world take too long.

But if there are no Forgotten Attacks, 7 seems like it would be too fast. Also, 7 is not high enough to prevent multi-accounting, the malus needs to be higher to really reduce the effectiveness of this tactic.

High malus slows progression with attacks activated since the pace makes forgotten attacks worse. So yea, I agree strategies have to change in such an environment.
b97cbae3213388ee
Seasoned Newcomer
2 years ago
I think alts are a thing anywhere....
A net of control?
fgshbdafb
2 years ago
we want malus 4 or malus 5
it is best to play for all
JasonAiden
2 years ago
Malus 4 or 5 is the best.

Jason
DubbelPorsie
2 years ago
Malus 4 or 5 please.
tokenting
Seasoned Newcomer
2 years ago
@EE_kalyn mallus 4 or 5 please , thank you
Kelloggs2
2 years ago
can we have Malus 4 or 5 as this works best and helps prevent multi accounting
_L0oNaTiC_
2 years ago
we asked players to vote against the one that everyone wanted to make it a more interesting server
_L0oNaTiC_
2 years ago
you asked players to vote for layout 1 because koegy told you to do it, as we all know you are joining him for WCS which in itself is just pathetic, you are an ingame CIC so surely you would want to play on your own with your team?

Forum Discussion

WCS discussion

About Tiberium Alliances General Discussion

Related Posts

Tomarang World Discussion Thread

Chestnut Ridge World Discussion

Schaffa & WCS 2021

Tartosa World Discussion Thead

WCS 2021 - questions

Recent Discussions

Kodiac upgrade

Public Test Environment

Vet with Malus?!?!

is it possible that EA hired players?

Done with game