not enough land space!

"jtgroth;1568076" wrote:
I don't think it's server related. I think it is based on the oldest client hardware they want to support. Most of us have fairly new phones or tablets, but there is a small percent playing on older hardware. I think the land space (and item limit) is based on making sure the players with older hardware can still play too. And before someone suggests that the limit be based on your device, remember that people play on multiple devices and also your neighbors may be playing on older devices too.

I think it's the other way around.more people using older devices. Otherwise they would expand more.

"KrustyBrand;1568112" wrote:
http://i.yomyomf.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/san2-postimg-110v.jpg
.....

hahahahahah

As someone who places everything out, I do not have very elaborate designs. Just placing the buildings and spacing them out.

It seems you have rather unrealistic expectations for this game My only suggestion is to keep what you feel suits your town and remove what's out of place.

asking for a little more land space = unrealistic expectations... lol ok

"whining for even more land space = baldfaced greed"

There, I fixed it for you.

There is enough land space. You are placing too many things. With decoration limits how can anyone possibly fill all that space?

"fishingguy73;1568657" wrote:
I've noticed that many people are just really inefficient using the land they have. No need to devote a large chunk for just one mansion or building. Pretend it's a metropolitan area. I've been playing since Whacking Day and have not had a problem with land yet.

Exactly. It is already quite clear that the game is not to scale. Therefore, a forest can be indicated by two rows of trees; a giant carpark by a dozen car spaces, etc.
Store things that you don't like. I didn't like Clash of Clones, and I've stored all three of the castles.
Store duplicates where one is enough. I've stored one of the terminal buildings that came with the current Destination Springfield event (one is an important and meaningful addition to the airport; two are a pointless waste of space).
There is also a lot of Springfield Heights duplicate stuff that definitely should be stored if you're running out of space. For example, having 10 of each type of building in Springfield Heights takes up a huge amount of space and is fundamentally pointless. Have one of each of the five levels of the carpark and business centre, and one or two of the classic mansion, modern mansion and resort - just enough to show off the various additions available.
I've got a house farm of 50 blue houses, plus several of each of the other types of house, all with yards, trees, fences and roads. I've got forests and roads and space around mansions and other buildings that need it. I've been playing since the the year of the Easter wheel debacle and haven't run out of space yet.

"22steelpaw;1568698" wrote:

"fishingguy73;1568657" wrote:
I've noticed that many people are just really inefficient using the land they have. No need to devote a large chunk for just one mansion or building. Pretend it's a metropolitan area. I've been playing since Whacking Day and have not had a problem with land yet.

Exactly. It is already quite clear that the game is not to scale. Therefore, a forest can be indicated by two rows of trees; a giant carpark by a dozen car spaces, etc.

There is also a lot of Springfield Heights duplicate stuff that definitely should be stored if you're running out of space. For example, having 10 of each type of building in Springfield Heights takes up a huge amount of space and is fundamentally pointless. Have one of each of the five levels of the carpark and business centre, and one or two of the classic mansion, modern mansion and resort - just enough to show off the various additions available.

I have about six parking spaces for my baseball stadium. Hope peoe dont mind taking the bus :)

The SH buildings are huge. And pretty ugly. But dont forget most come with an XP multiplier. It adds up. 153% total

For example, having 10 of each type of building in Springfield Heights takes up a huge amount of space and is fundamentally pointless.

Unless of course, you count the huge hidden multiplier for keeping them out (minus additions, of course). Not really pointless.