Worlds Largest Toilet

Dislike is fine by me, but flags are there for a reason.
Without wishing to second guess or back seat moderate I suspect it is all on record.
Whatever that may imply for the persistent abuser is not public knowledge, nor should it be.

You mean there might be people on here who are likely to dislike things ?!? :)

How about creating a "Meh" flag, might that satisfy the disgruntled squirrels out there ??
( so long as you can earn badges from them )

Excellent joke! Almost had me until I read the date it was posted.

Oh dear, I tried to be the voice of reason, but now it appears that I'm "It"

Serves me right for pretending to be a grown up, I guess.

I dislike that you disliked it!

"frosted1414;c-2190771" wrote:

"1MikeyM;c-2190716" wrote:
Or just add a dislike reaction.

It's silly we have 3 like buttons and no dislike option
In the olden days, before the buttons, people had to actually post a message to express their opinion.

I remember. It was.... interesting at times.

Too bad these flags don't come with an XP bonus.

"bluntcard;c-2190815" wrote:
Too bad these flags don't come with an XP bonus.

That would be great.
Maybe we could have a leaderboard too.

I don't think you can equate someone anonymously flagging posts with a 'toxic' forum. It's not active enough to have an atmosphere!

The flagging does essentially nothing. Doesn't remove the post, doesn't stop the poster posting, doesn't even give the poster a notification. On a mobile browser it is barely noticeable.

There has to be more to it. I suspect that person, wherever it was, tried to ask a question and was either ignored, fell foul of the rules and felt upset, or had a joke at their expense that they didn't get - then they went somewhere else to badmouth this forum.



If we're talking improvements, how about changing the one-click flag option to a more developed 'report' option where you click once to open a menu, select a reason, type something and submit. The more clicks, the less likely a joker is to abuse the system, and because a user has to submit it their username is probably attached to it instead of the current seemingly-anonymous method.