Forum Discussion

Kakkadonitsi's avatar
Kakkadonitsi
2 years ago

Ranked is way too placement biased.

For me, rank should be the metric of how good player you are. Yeah its not always accurate and in battle royale its hard to get right, but this current point system is WAAAY out of whack. Like if I ...
gameplay discussion
HappyHourSumwur's avatar
HappyHourSumwur
Seasoned Ace
2 years ago

The best players and teams get lots of kills and win.  The S in FPS stands for 'Shooter'.  Pretty simple, really.

Kakkadonitsi's avatar
Kakkadonitsi
2 years ago

Dont understand your point. Like are you opposing or agreeing? The best players get a lot of kills but they're worth nothing in the current system. Then again a guy ratting the ring gets more points without firing once, in this SHOOTER game.

  • HappyHourSumwur's avatar
    HappyHourSumwur
    Seasoned Ace
    2 years ago

    Yes, I'm agreeing with you.  The current ranked system weights placement too much and ranked matches ave become more about avoiding fights than actually shooting enemies.

    • Kakkadonitsi's avatar
      Kakkadonitsi
      2 years ago

      7th place with 4 kills, and all of them damn clutch endgame kills. What do I get for that? 12 points. God damn 12 points for clutching us better placement. This is ridicilous.

      • Kakkadonitsi's avatar
        Kakkadonitsi
        2 years ago

        5th with 6 kills, +27 eliminations points...?

    • reconzero's avatar
      reconzero
      Seasoned Ace
      2 years ago

      @HappyHourSumwur

      "Yes, I'm agreeing with you."

      Well, I gave you a like even though I clearly misinterpreted what you were saying. To me it read as if to say, "get all the kills you want, just make sure you also place." Personally I think the old system was pointless. Get five kills, die in 15th place, and then get buckets of points and a rank up? That's as bad in its own way as what we have now except that it made impatient people feel better about their impatience.