Activision is pursuing the large sites 1st, typically because they work the best.
@BurnYaBadIt’s a waste of time, you will see the people who run these just provide the hacks out of counties in which the litigation And rulings have no jurisdiction. They might be able to get a few sites shut down. But it won’t have the impact you think.
Look at Spam emails, many countries have laws against it. But let’s say I go out and buy a domain name with out making the whois private. That will broadcast the information to the globe. Give it 24 hours and the email address I used to register the domain will have hundreds if not thousands of spam emails that violate US anti-spam laws. If they get your phone number, you’ll get dozens if not hundreds of text messages a day. That happens because the people doing the spamming are outside of US Jurisdiction. Same stuff with go on with the people who provide hacks.
The best solution is a solid anticheat AI that can adapt with the new hacks and rapidly. Instead of spend millions on litigation that will have minimal impact, spend that money on developing anticheat AI.
EA does a lot to combat cheating. They want to end it just as much as you and I, but they are not public about the things they do.
block chain is the final evolution for security. the 1st game developer to put this 10 year old tech into use will have a 100% secure game, and they know it. Im starting to believe insiders at these gaming companies are making millions from cheat kickbacks. Do not underestimate greed.
