4 years ago
Can someone explain why?
Why does the contact support have the option to report a player with their name and even allow you to send pictured evidence if they are just going to reply with an automated message directing you to...
@XxColdFangxX while some players imo should be named and shamed, the fact of the matter is innocent until proven guilty. I've seen a number of posts here that implied cheating in the first post with video, but were soon shown to be possibly otherwise by more experienced heads.
Do you know every single angle of the game that would make you a most excellent judge, jury and executioner?
@XxColdFangxX I don't think so. Perhaps you need you need reread my post.
@XxColdFangxX wrote:
@Renegade_Prime86honestly I don't see why we aren't allowed to name and shame.
Vs
@OldTreeCreeper wrote:
@XxColdFangxX while some players imo should be named and shamed, the fact of the matter is innocent until proven guilty.
@XxColdFangxX don't see how you could be confused as to our posts being basically the same. You appear to say that players should be the ones to name and shame, I don't say that. QED
@OldTreeCreeperyou don't see how there is confusion?
"While some players imo should be shared..."
This statement does not specify that you have an issue with WHO is sharing, rather it states that you have an issue with WHAT kind is being shared. Like cheater vs hatespeech, and instead of specifying you had an issue with the who at the end, you finished with "innocent until proven guilty."
You even have an explanation as to why, but without that key component it just looks like you're agreeing.
For lack of better words, don't half * your sentences and expect other people to get it, then condescend to them when they don't.
But thanks for clearing that up.
I for one think this convo has gone way off topic, if you have anything to add about my actual topic question I'd love to hear it, if not, well, nice chat, I'm done with it.