The point is, to many people, the game being “available” on so and so platform also directly means your purchases will be available on all the listed platforms.
Another example can be a parent who does not play this game but is making purchases for their child will read the marketing material, will read the legal document and will have been successfully deceived into believing their potentially large purchases will be available on those platforms.
I dont think it is implied. I do think it should just be a mandatory addition to games that have in game purchases especially when those purchases are in the form of gambling such as lootboxes. This is a poorly veild attempt to get those whales spending again if they choose to play on another platform. But hey what do I know I'm just a * freeloader right? God EA is trash.
Well because this involves money, it could still very likely be considered fraudulent by the court. Because micro transactions are relatively new, this type of stuff hasn’t been litigated yet. All it would take is to find a parent who has actually been deceived and we can begin a class-action lawsuit.
I can provide multiple examples where top games either provide cross-progression or disclose lack of cross progression in-game. Your knowledge of other games being deceptive does not excuse EA.
