Forum Discussion
Well at least they are doing something...kinda positive yet at the same time pointless given how fractured and unmonitored this community is:
- smurfs
- hackers
- casuals playing ranked willing to get Masters without even trying
- etc.
I mean from these 3 reasons alone I would say a sane person would get like 90%+ "no" answers which unfortunately would not be representative, if Respawn's goal would be to make matchmaking actually fair, not just fun or enjoyable (free lobbies / bot lobbies).
Hopefully there are separate people working on this and hacking issue otherwise I would not approve not dumping every hand on deck towards hacking issue which seems to be going to be end of Apex, at least for me... 15 seasons basically without quitting and now I just could not bare it anymore twice this year alone.
Sadly I have to agree with everything you said. But the 90% no answers are not even a thing if the average player says "no" and then immediately re-queues. At some point they'll get the data that shows 90% of "no" responders log off the game after that match, and then don't log on again for two weeks. THAT'S what will get their attention.
- Eshshshss27 days agoSeasoned Ace
Yup for sure - the best power / vote we have is with out wallets (for those who spend money on the game) and activity time in game (to increase or decrease probably the most important metric of the game - active player count).
About Apex Legends General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 6 hours ago
- 18 hours ago