How about changing in game reporting

---

@Ki11DowN wrote:

Even though we know it makes no difference and the only reason "hideout" came about was SoarKobi exposed that the initial in game reporting was going to NOBODY. SO the solution in a multi billion dollar company with revenues from launch up to this past february was 1.2 billion dollars roughly on a "free to play", the best they can do is put one guy that only the white list and special pro and ttv players can send messages to and have someone band or looked at? Found out the devs are all on controller , now you know why they keep moving up AA on console and pc.. It will never be nerfed. But i digress, you could put an admin on each server, ya dont have many of them but you dont. EasyAnti is not good, Vanguard is a joke as we've seen and more money in having cheaters build accounts , buy skins and heirlooms than it is to ban them but at least change the in game reporting so people feel good and think they are actually reporting someone and it will be looked at? The in game reporting is from like the stone age, the choices. Mix in the fact blatant smurfing by your precious pros and ttv's and we all know who, and nobody banned. How about updating the in game choices for the reporting? How about walls? Oh , thats right, since 3 characters already have walls in the game, it will be to hard to tell if they are walling or using their abilities. smh.... No... not when you get walled by ash, wraith, caus.. etc etc ... FPS is at an all time low. As long as you are making money, as long as the cash cows are making money that its ok . You adjust aim assist for pred but not everyone else playing? How many are in pred? 750? They dont make up apex. I see more and more leaving and only nickmercs saved you by himself. Apex was down to 35k viewers on twitch and when him and CARRIED TiFU (i wont talk about his suddenly improvement in gameplay the last money) but then apex is around 100k viewers. You had 100 million download this game by the 2nd month of release. Where are they? Sounds familiar like a previous br (pubg) Anyway, this is on deaf ears but at least others will read it. 

---

So you are literally suggesting that Respawn/EA are ok with cheaters because (your words) "..we've seen and more money in having cheaters build accounts , buy skins and heirlooms than it is to ban them but at least change the in game reporting so people feel good and think they are actually reporting someone and it will be looked at? The in game reporting is from like the stone age, the choices. Mix in the fact blatant smurfing by your precious pros and ttv's and we all know who, and nobody banned".

Give your head a shake, take your tin foil hat off and lose the conspiracy BS.  Neither of us know for certain what they are doing against cheaters, but I have zero doubt they are trying to fight t as best they can.  It's a goalpost that's constantly moving as these losers (cheaters) will find new ways to become losers every day so it's a constant battle.  I don't like it any more than you do but grow up with the conspiracy nonsense.

This is a constant theme I have seen throughout numerous game communities.  "I don't like this/this isn't being fixed fast enough/this is unfair" therefore it's tacitly ok from the game developers because it makes more money.  Absolutely ridiculous.

FIFA is bad for this too.  "Pack openings depend on when you open it/how long you have been away/etc".  "The game is ScRiPtEd... look this guy on YoU tUbE sAyS sO".

Cut them some slack.  I have zero doubt they are working on this as best they can.

There are fair criticisms you can make towards companies that make billions on a game (FIFA as an example, they have some serious UI/UX and search issues but it is improving). 

If you're not happy then fine, make reasonable criticisms.  i hate match making.  i think it's totally broke.  I also suspect they are aware of this and are trying to fix it but, again, because everyone tries to game the system to their advantage it's a hard target to meet.  I get that.