@iBlockHead wrote:
@Wingmannedbroeven when you know you are wrong, you still attempt to defend yourself, what a shame.
We were here before the edit, OP did abuse it, there is no debating that.
The warning has been brought and anyone else using it after is only looking to receive the punishment thats to come.
XP just tells me you are on here a lot, just like how I managed to rack up a good amount of it over time, but it doesn't mean much when brought into this argument.
Back on topic, "judgement day" is reasonable and those who argue against it only do it in hopes to save themselves, not because they care about true rank or helping the game grow.
Please paraphrase me the part where OP stated he had abused the exploit? Because I read the original post prior to the edit.
OP had mentioned that the realities of loss loss forgiveness forces many to adapt. Which is not an admission.
Thank the lord you guys aren't public prosecutors and never will be.
[Edit]
Here is James Duane's famous lecture from a couple of years ago explaining to law students why you should never talk to the police.
At the start of his lecture, he reads out a fictive statement of certain of facts about a triple homicide. Later on James questions the audience about this.
Even in the setting of an eminent law school almost the entire audience was completely convinced they had heard James say the three victims were killed in a shooting with the use of firearms. When in fact the words "shooting" "gun" "firearms" of even the word "weapon" was literally never mentioned.
What James did mention was that the victims were killed in what the police suspected was gang related violence. James used to example in his talk to demonstrate to the audience that you cannot trust your own mind to be capable of always making truthful statements that cannot be found untrue by police and the evidence they have at their disposal.
And this served to illustrate his points that innocent individuals fully convinced they are telling the truth can easily become suspects in murder trials. And also get convicted to life in prison and even deathrow based on statements they had made to investigators (which happens shockingly often).
This is exactly what applies to you guys here.
You all jumped the gun and made an assumption that OP plead guilty when in fact he did not, and in retrospect you thoroughly believe that you read something in OP's statements which was in fact your own interpretation of a statement.
There is a an overwhelming volume of scientific research on the phenomenon of the brain being unable to tell the difference between what they have perceived with their senses and thoughts they had at that same period of time
You think i am only the top XP author here based on time spent alone? Maybe this is partially true. But it should be clear to you at this point that I probably know more about this subject than you.
