Perfect Teammate Match & Finding System
I have 1500+ hours of game time. I usually go up to the Diamond level. But now I stopped playing. Because now whenever I want to play, my teammates given to me by the system are low level. While my t...
Forum Discussion
@EdwardDLuffy
How do you think it should be? How would you like it to be?
@l_mRGogo Just more consistent. I think kdr over the last 50 games played is the more accurate metric, but the rumours are Respawn base their MM on getting you to play again as opposed to giving you TMs who are level with you, skills wise.
@EdwardDLuffy
K/D ratio of the last 50 games played. I think it's a good idea.
But is only K/D enough? I met many players. Some wait without firing in order to KS (Kill Steal). I think the Damage Done part is also important or its contribution to the team.- @EdwardDLuffy Kd over last 50? That is too limited. Placement, winning and max rank have to mean something in a BR. Even damage done should have some influence.
@hayhor
How do you think it should be? I would like to hear your opinion.@hayhor Maybe but playstyle might be more important than how "good" a player is. This was mention on other threads but matching players based on playstyle would lead to teammates at least being on the same page and all generally contributing to a fight even if the damage done isn't equal.
I don't know about the rest of you but most of my losses come from my squad making their own individual decisions without communicating them. Inevitably one of us fights 1v3 without anyone else noticing or being able to help.
@l_mRGogo I'm mostly happy with random teammates but I hate playing with aggressive players or looters. I'd even want random matchmaking or playstyle based.
@heme725
I think you are lucky. My problem is not timing. My 20th level silver rank teammates are my enemies while my 500th level is diamond rank. They can't even hit when confronted. Some can't even choose weapons. Some don't know the map or the traits of your character.How do you think the SBMM system should be?
