100% agree. And I'm not sure if you or anyone knows how much Apex actually generates EA annually. It's a billion, with a "B." And that's a conservatives estimate. There's no reason, other than greed or poor management as to why they can't port this game to a functioning game engine like UE5. And yes, this game on UE5 would be amazing. In fact, it might actually register footsteps consistently. But that's the trifecta, Game engine, Servers, management. If you don't hear anything addressing these issues, especially the first 2, I would assume it's never going to improve because of it's ongoing technical limitations.
@ThisGameBlowsThe audacity of EA calling this a 10yr game is still funny. Don’t get me wrong I still enjoy it but the small inconveniences really stack up sometimes.
Haha, yeah right. I literally "lol'd" when they said that. It's clearly a message to appease their shareholders and to keep players continuously purchasing skins or other content for their fiscal quarters. That's all. Personally, I would appreciate transparency. If they came out and said, "We are never porting the game to a new game engine, nor addressing the audio issues and servers issues that plague the game. If they said that, it would suck, but at least I would appreciate and respect their honesty. I think that's where a lot of frustration lies, is the lack of transparency these companies exude for their "live service" titles.
