Re: Patent for cheats
@Vdstrk I don't know why they would need to do this. Game companies can sue cheat makers as far as I can remember or atleast that's what riotgames and bungie did to a cheat developer.
@Daze623
The reason to have a copyrighted/patent on a cheat is to have the legal grounds to keep it off the market. As the owner of it you control distribution.
Sure people can "counterfeit it". But that would lead to great troubles.
it would result in increased prices for cheats, excluding a large portion of cheaters who may have to think about before cheating.
As a consequence cheat makers would be less incentivized to join in the market, pushing prices even higher.
Only players who can afford to spend a lot of money on cheats would be left along with few providers.
All in all it would make the issue of cheating less relevant/common, and easier to fight.
Also, and this is a whole different point or strategy, if EA would have their own cheat developing department, they would in fact be a step ahead of cheaters, by being proactive, instead of reactive. And in so doing updating their anti cheat engine before cheats are independently developed and sold.
And what I mean here is, If EA actively works towards developing each and every way an aimbot can be written, then they could patch it before someone else finds how to build that specific aimbot. (same for other cheats).
It's not that easy to just update the anti-cheat and call it a day.
Fun fact: anti-cheat devs look for popular cheats and see how they work with their game to make it easier to detect them.
Cannot say if that's also the case for Apex but no need to develop your own cheats if there enough to adjust the detection to cheats that are in use. 
@Zeelmaekers
Exactly because it is not that easy to update the anti-cheat and call it a day, and exogenous help may be just what is needed.
No need for "fun facts" sarcasm. Thank you.
if there are enough cheats detected to adjust the detection system, why are there so many cheaters still in game?
I understand you have a different point of view, and it's ok with me. You stated that already.
Thank you for your input.
@DoYaSeeMe
No.
I disagree. So no point in arguing.