There Should Be Non-Aim Assisted Lobbies
I continue to see an increasing argument that aim assistance and/ or its inclusion is fine, but that derives mostly from individuals that either A: use it personally and/ or B: Haven't used mouse & ...
Forum Discussion
@RaginSam Actually yes, I've compiled data in the past about pros and mnk vs controller. It's actually very balanced usage and kill wise. I've posted the data and other peoples data on this very forum.
Some pros have switched. Only one has had any real success. Madness and Sweet(both mnk mind you) both recently talked about how mnk is superior and the mix at the pro level is actually good. But again, like most those are "feelings", not actual data.
Some pros have switched. Only one has had any real success. Madness and Sweet(both mnk mind you) both recently talked about how mnk is superior and the mix at the pro level is actually good. But again, like most those are "feelings", not actual data.
@hayhor Would you mind posting the data again? If you are referring to the data that was shared on Reddit some years ago you need to keep in mind that those numbers are on the pro level, and from a very small sample size. It does not reflect real world gameplay out in the wild for the average Joe. Also something to consider is why the one clip data was so heavily (almost double) in favor of controller, even at pro level. I'm confident that this is actually the case in real world gameplay as well which is why so many people get upset about it. They simply can't counter it effectively up close. I've never seen any balancing on either input. And queue times were never an issue. These are not feelings when people observe something and see obvious issues with it, the data you ask for as proof does not exist because no one has access to it. I'm not sure why you would even suggest all is fine and people should deal when the reality is staring you in the face.
Community Highlights
- EA_Mako3 months ago
Community Manager
