The GTX 770 goes between 45 and 50 FPS with all the settings at minimum (1920x1080), I get 20 FPS while dropping and in Fragment I get around 35 FPS, I tried all the things in the Ziel's guide but nothing helped, I have seen tests performed and results are the same, while a 1050 ti stays above 60 FPS with some dips, 1050 Ti is less powerful than 770, I'm thinking that my GPU was not optimized by developers.My specs are like the reccommended ones except for the GPUOS: Windows 10 bit Pro NCPU: Intel i5-4690 3.50 GHzRAM: x2 4 GB DDR3 1600 MHz (8GB total)GPU: Nvidia GTX 770 2 GB (Overclocked, also tested the stock configuration flashing it)I can't have decent performance even on the lowest settings, while I usually play at high settings in other games.

The only "solution" that I found to this problem is to set resolution at 1600x900 (it stays always above 60 except during dropping and at Fragment) and to use Nvidia Sharpening from the Control Panel, I set it to 0.60 and ignore film grain to 0.68, the image is way clearer, you can see the effect of sharpening (white edges) but it's nicer for the resolution and I can have decent FPS

Nvidia GTX 770 Poor Performance | EA Forums

11 Replies

LiolikAlkoholik
6 years ago
GTX 1050 Ti is better actually, don't know where you got the information that GTX 770 is better. It's most likely that the GPU is too old I'm afraid or this game is horribly optimized. Because I have a laptop with the same generation GPU (GTX 780M). Your GPU should much faster than mine, as yours is a desktop variant, but I get pretty similar results.
Zeelmaekers
Hero+
6 years ago
Hey @Justeego

The GTX 770 is a bit of an older card and other parts of your PC are also not really recent, so it's normal you are getting that kind of performance.
I recommend upgrading the Memory(RAM) and video card if you want a decent gaming experience.
The 1050 TI is a more modern card with more VRAM and a different architecture that's why it's is getting higher framerates in Apex Legends.
https://www.ea.com/games/apex-legends/about/pc-system-requirements
Justeego
6 years ago
https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1050-Ti-vs-Nvidia-GTX-770/3649vs2174
https://versus.com/en/msi-geforce-gtx-1050-ti-vs-nvidia-geforce-gtx-770
My GPU is a full fat brick with 3 fans spinning for disspating the heat and it's overclocked, don't compare it to a single fan laptop because it shows how much do you know about the subject.
Justeego
6 years ago
My card has double memory bandwidith double and cuda cores, so I'm expecting at last same performance or a bit less. I have a great gaming experience playing Doom 2016 at High with v-syinc on, here I can't even reach 60 FPS with Low settings? It just seems that developers don't want me to play their game with my GPU.
https://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-1050-ti/specifications
https://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-770/specifications
I posted benchmarks above, my PC is fine for 1080p.
LiolikAlkoholik
6 years ago
Just because they're old, doesn't mean they're bad. Those specs should be more than enough to provide 1080p60 experience even at Medium. @Zeelmaekers
R9 290 was released in the same year as GTX 770 and that AMD card is in the recommended game specifications.
Justeego
6 years ago
I don't know why but my reply got lost, anyway:
https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-770-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1050-Ti/2174vs3649
https://versus.com/en/msi-geforce-gtx-1050-ti-vs-nvidia-geforce-gtx-770
My GPU is a full fat brick with 3 fans to disspate heat, you can't compare it to a single fan laptop.
Justeego
6 years ago
I don't know why but my message always disappears:
https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-gtx-770.c1856
I posted other links to other benchmarks but maybe this is why it disappears, anyway you can easily google comparisons and my 770 should perform similar to 1050ti, not this bad.
LiolikAlkoholik
6 years ago
They're quite similar, but 1050 Ti is just newer, has newer technology and in some games it gets about 10fps more, but I doubt because of that the performance in this game should differ this much. Because as I said, I even have a slower computer then you and you get pretty much the same fps as I do, that's the sign of bad optimization if you ask me.
Justeego
6 years ago
The only "solution" that I found to this problem is to set resolution at 1600x900 (it stays always above 60 except during dropping and at Fragment) and to use Nvidia Sharpening from the Control Panel, I set it to 0.60 and ignore film grain to 0.68, the image is way clearer, you can see the effect of sharpening (white edges) but it's nicer for the resolution and I can have decent FPS
Zaares
6 years ago
@Justeego I have the same GPU and also struggling with FPS. I have 75Hz 16:10 display, so I'm forced to play 1152x720 to get almost always 75 FPS. I have 40-45 FPS in the dropship, and drops in Fragment and while looking at Sorting Factory from The Tree. About 60 FPS and 0.5 resolution scale (because of adaptive target settings), so it's 576x300 and I can't see my targets, it's a pixelated mess, not mentioning input lag.

Yes, input lag, weirdly, is way worse on Worlds Edge than on Kings Canyon. I know that while I have drops to 60 FPS, frametime is worse but I mean even with 75 FPS capped it's a slight delay in aiming on WE. Then, for comparison, I change the game mode to Deja Loot on Kings Canyon and suddenly I can aim with Wingman, PK, etc.

I've tried so many things and I can't get that snappiness that I know from other games or at least from Kings Canyon. Playing on ReviOS 1709 (custom Win10) without game mode and fullscreen optimalizations helps a bit but I still feel the difference between maps.