Cheesier graphics after update...
Is it me or do the graphics look even cheesier after the 3.2 update? Starting look like an iPhone game.
Forum Discussion
35 Replies
@David6479
Yeah i have mistakenly not posted the one with the 10900k but well it was still very similar lol between 60 to 75 fps at best .. and if using tensor core etc.. it could go to the 75-85 ish but well thatts another story ..
Its exactly as i expected .. the game dosnt run in the High 120 fpps lol thats for sure My 3080 Score the same on many games as many 3090 with 3 to 5 fps difference its insanely minimal yet my card isnt used much in 1440p and is not fully used in 4k but the limiting factor atm is CPU mostly but also there is some backend work to be done ..
I have also noticed that servers performances affect FPS in this game similar to star citizen .. i have had some full 128 players servers that ran into the 120-140 fps 1 day before patch 3.02 when normally i was running around 90fps so there is some odd stuff that make the game less fluid wich affect the visual perception make texture look worst ..
Just watch a 30 fps youtube video on your phone then watch a 60fps cap video and you will see a imediate difference and you will feel as if texture are more crisp in the 60fps video then well while gaming there is even more difference between over 100 fps and 60 fps or belowWas this one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpbODop4WhI
@Stew360 I'm no expert and I've been out the custom pc building for a few years but the videos are at different stages of the game being updated and also surly having one system using Windows 11 and the other Windows 10 effects the handling of the CPU allocation.
I know we are talking about the CPU but the GPU Nvidia drivers in one are 472.12 with 511.23 being the most recent, I'm not disagreeing with you or anything just too many variables in the Videos.
- @Stew360 the CPU is the issue in this engine, not the GPU.
I have the 3080FTW3 and 12700KF. 120fps is totally doable @ 1440p.
The real issue with this game is the the frame-pacing above 90hz, not the framerate, per se. - @RipGroove99 I even play with High textures and when I zoom on the ground, some parts of the maps has pixellated textures. XD The whole game looks absolutely terrible. But! For multiplayer this clean look (minus the 20 years old textures) is amazing. Game has amazing visiblity.
- @Jozso987 Oh yeah well technically low res textures and all that is perfect for super competitive type games but the BF franchise was (and has done since it's been around) supposed to lean towards more of a gritty realistic type game, they used to make such a fuss about how detailed their maps were and how amazing they looked back when they launched previous BF titles.
- @David6479
My friend over has a 3090 watercool and a I910900k wich is pretty equivalent to the 11900k and he has between 60 and 80 fps depending on the load 80 being the best in 4k so he play in 1440p with optimised setting and he gets about the same type of FPS as me with a 3080 OC and My friend M4 gets similar fps with only a 2070 super lol so there is that - @afzSnickelfritz
Exactly in 1440p i have no doubt about this in 4k unfortunaly regardless i havnt seen anyones neither with a 3080 or 3080ti or 3090 being able to get much more than a 70ish FPS on average ...
In 1440p me with a 3080 my friend over with a 3090 and M4 with a 2070super we all have very similar FPS wich can be anywhere between 80 Lows and 110 to 130 FPS average it depends a lots but if i am getting 110 in an area we all get around 110 in the same area at the same momment @RipGroove99
Since its been around ? Hahaha ... BF before BF3 has never ever been a showcase of beauty at all ..
BFBC wasnt pretty at all .. BF2 was not graphically amasing either not even for its time period ..
You could not compare BF to a Killzone 2 or a gears of wars back then the game was based on Combines arms gameplay and graphics were minimalistic etc.. .
Graphically intensive stuff came with the rework of Frostbite and BF3 and 4 prior to that BF was never " pretty " it was a okish to bad looking game at bestAlso BF2042 vegetation and explosions and tons of details are 10xtime better looking than past BF .. it also have a dynamic weather system wich is amasing looking ..
Its not just about how textures are when you zoom in .. i dont spend all day zooming in texture when i am playing .. they made some sacrifice here and there to bring more immersive stuff .. dynamic stuff on guns and track in snow , sand , dynamic weather system . tornados .. rain that start and stop and so on and on sandstorms
@Stew360 I'm not disagreeing with you but if it's one thing I've learned from my overclocking days is that NO two systems are the same no matter if they had exactly the same hardware. Operating system, overclocking, a custom GPU BIOS, throttling due to poor cooling, GPU drivers, even just having OC monitoring software or some overlay in the background can add stuttering.
I've mostly found it's software related in past experiments.
- @David6479 You won't get anywhere with him, I know exactly what performance my PC was getting with 2042 before Christmas and he's telling me I'm wrong lol I simply can't be bothered to try to convince him because what's the point? I couldn't care less if someone on a forum doesn't believe me about something, especially when I 100% know I'm right.
