New locked classes ruined the game

---

@Tank2042Man wrote:

@GVlXxf"that why BF is a sucessful FPS game, as ppl can do anything they want before class system return. it is a bad return".

Huh, you just contradicted yourself. Before Specialists players could NOT do anything they wanted.

2042 was not successful which is why they returned to the new hybrid class system.

---

Judging by the Steam no., there were 3 times as many players playing the game with the introduction of a new map & new weapons in Season 3 rather than the last update with the "new class system".
That makes me believe the BF 2042 loyal fan base preffers new content (maps, weapons, QoL improvements) over bringing back outdated legacy features like class system.

---

@UP_LordPlumber wrote:
@HeroCllassIt was also fun to play in a tank when there are 64 players running around with rocket launchers.

---

Now you have a bunch of Lis players with more accurate rockets... So much better now.

@SCUBASTEVE120 

I bought the game as it was advertised. It's like expecting a band to keep making the same exact type of album over and over or something.

Conquest, combined arms class based combat is what minimal definition of Battlefield title is for me. If either of elements is missing, it isn't Battlefield game in my book. It's suffering identity crisis at that point like Battlefield 2042 did.

---

@VME23 wrote:

---

@Tank2042Man wrote:

@GVlXxf"that why BF is a sucessful FPS game, as ppl can do anything they want before class system return. it is a bad return".

Huh, you just contradicted yourself. Before Specialists players could NOT do anything they wanted.

2042 was not successful which is why they returned to the new hybrid class system.

---

Judging by the Steam no., there were 3 times as many players playing the game with the introduction of a new map & new weapons in Season 3 rather than the last update with the "new class system".
That makes me believe the BF 2042 loyal fan base preffers new content (maps, weapons, QoL improvements) over bringing back outdated legacy features like class system.

---

Or perhaps you are comparing apples and oranges.

Content is what brings people but the "legacy features" are there to help them stay once they come.

Currently many people are probably done getting their battlepass to 100 and are taking a break until season 4

I would give it until season 4 comes for the effects of 3.2 to show

BF2042 is still on a journey to get where it should had launched at in terms of features and  gamlpay

@SCUBASTEVE120

not in the video per se, but i have definitely seen your name around or similar

its a cool game handle

Battlefield would KICK THE CRAP out of COD or any other game and its hay day would not be in the past

If EA stopped making such bad decisions...

People would be throwing their money at EA, if only they listened to their customers, instead of their shareholders..

see my previous post for list of failures on EA's part....

@VME23
The maps are crap - they are hard to navigate, they are limited in scope and they do not match battlefield, they match cod

EA has said "oh it looks pretty and thats all what people want" and that is wrong - i have seen crap games with poor graphics
excel!

Its all about the GAME PLAY...good graphics are nice but they are not the core of the game......the core of the game IS THE GAME

also i wish EA would stop putting up crappy "fairy tale" single player mode, real battlefield players are multiplayers....

if you want single player games, go play cod...

@RaginSam
Bunch of rockets that do not do anything really..

@SCUBASTEVE120 - next post

im apart of the sub class of battlefield players that listen to "cotton eye joe" while playing, when im not team working that is =)

@UP_Hawxxeye

in my opinion - bf2042 is absolutely beautiful for the eyes - but its broken - see list of broken or missing stuff on previous post (page 3 i think)

@HeroCllass
I do not even have to look into the list to agree.
The game was released too soon and with the wrong design goals. So all its lifetime is going to be a redemption arc in order to keep the franchise alive
BF4 was also similar in being released too soon, but it (mostly) had the correct base framework from release

---

@Tank2042Man wrote:

@GVlXxf"that why BF is a sucessful FPS game, as ppl can do anything they want before class system return. it is a bad return".

Huh, you just contradicted yourself. Before Specialists players could NOT do anything they wanted.

2042 was not successful which is why they returned to the new hybrid class system.

---

they went to half measure classes because of the wailing and gnashing of teeth of people who don't play the game and who won't come back.  all this half measure does is drive away people who did like the game.

i'm not saying that they are trying to kill the game, but looking at every decision dice made post launch with this game, if they were trying to kill it what would they do differently?

---

@VME23 wrote:

---

@Tank2042Man wrote:

@GVlXxf"that why BF is a sucessful FPS game, as ppl can do anything they want before class system return. it is a bad return".

Huh, you just contradicted yourself. Before Specialists players could NOT do anything they wanted.

2042 was not successful which is why they returned to the new hybrid class system.

---

Judging by the Steam no., there were 3 times as many players playing the game with the introduction of a new map & new weapons in Season 3 rather than the last update with the "new class system".
That makes me believe the BF 2042 loyal fan base preffers new content (maps, weapons, QoL improvements) over bringing back outdated legacy features like class system.

---

some "legacy features" are not outdated.  i'd rather be able to join a squad, leave a squad, play on my own, or kick a player from squad (you know, squad management) than this half measure class crap.  same with persistent servers that had a real rotation and players stayed in the server until they CHOSE to leave.   somehow those things are considered "legacy features"