Forum Discussion
28 Replies
- @slizzard get rid of snipers? what do you want next? get rid of armor piercing ammo and or vehicles to destroy tanks? get a grip
- UP_Hawxxeye4 years agoLegend
Defeated Tank driver: "... and I would had gotten away with it in not for these meddling snipers and their dumb robot dog!"
RANGER: "Scooby dooby doooooooooo!"
- @DrimacusEUROCORP try shooting a m1 with a 50 and see what happens? its not going to do *. that gun is way over powered.
- Psubond4 years agoLegend@slizzard then by your logic AGMs should OHK a tank...if we're doing it by what would happen in real life that is.
anti material rifles exists for a reason
one of them is to disable a tank by shooting weak parts of it, i.e. less armored parts, tracks, rear...
- @slizzard I mean, this ain't a milsim so no.
I swear vehicle drivers just want to play a game where they roll around like gods and can't be touched by infantry. While I don't think we should get rid of snipers as the OP suggested I do think it's dumb that the .50 can kill an armored tank. Disable a track maybe, but not blow it to bits.
@slizzard is this like your first Battlefield?
Because snipers have pretty much been annoying little turds since the original BF so I don't think they are going anywhere, lol.
- cso77774 years agoSeasoned Ace
Antitank weapons in BF games are generally pretty weak, having a sniper rifle with even less damage than rocket launchers, is not really an issue (balance-wise).
You can argue that these 'special' weapons often some distract people from PTFOing and that is perhaps the biggest issue, they are too specific / limited in use.
@cso7777 wrote:Antitank weapons in BF games are generally pretty weak, having a sniper rifle with even less damage than rocket launchers, is not really an issue (balance-wise).
You can argue that these 'special' weapons often some distract people from PTFOing and that is perhaps the biggest issue, they are too specific / limited in use.
I wish they'd bring back the "sweet spots" on armor so you at least have a chance of taking them down from the sides or behind like you used to.
I've shot every M5 I had only to have armor shrug it off like it was nothing.
- @Ironhead841 Tanks take 4 to kill, and we get 3 with the M5. It's ludicrous given that it's already hard enough to tag a tank with all 3 rockets without getting killed by the tank or other players, especially since vehicles can self-repair.
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 10 hours ago