BF6 Needs More Vehicles helicopters and Jets

First time I see someone on a forum giving good points and bad points regarding the profile of other people. So yes you are weird. You continue to affirm things about me based on NOTHING. Just your disturbed imagination.

I NEVER said that I don’t want vehicles. I am just saying that 2 tanks and 2 flying vehicles are enough for each team.

Now your reference is based on Battlefield 1942. You need to move on. That was more than 20 years ago. This game actually smells like sh it.

And all the other people who don’t agree with you are:
1 - 12 year old
2 - COD player
3 - Not purist enough to give feedback
4 - Want to delete all vehicles from the game
5 - A troll

You are the perfect example of the degeneration of a part of the population. Not even able to have a discussion on a forum with other points of view:
IF YOU ARE NOT AGREE WITH ME BLAH BLAH BLAH

On Battlefield 1942 the state of mind was clearly not yours. Much more tolerant.

Reading these comments, I feel like I can strike a compromise in saying in maps like Cairo I get only having 4 vehicles (2 MBTs, 2 IFVs) but that's because it's so tiny and no other vehicles would make sense. Liberation Peak on the other hand is too large for 4 air vehicles, 6 ground vehicles in total. 

That being said though, honestly killing vehicles if anything is easier than it's ever been so I can't see the complaints around having more of them. Play engineer. Their mines/AA kit/rocket launcher are ridiculously effective. And recon's C4 package can destroy MBTs instantly if you wire up a road 4x before it crosses. 

not true battlefield 1 was very vehicle oriented what do you mean you had horses, cars, armored trucks, tanks and fianlly planes, dont get me started with the behemoths like the train and blimp, battlefield 6 isnt battlefield

We need in Conquest

Helicopter we need MH-6 bird, attack heli and a Z-9 transport heli in conquest and stealth bombers

You're boring mate, go troll elsewhere :)

Like I and other people in this post have stated we agree the current maps are too small for more vehicles if any should be on them at all. I personally wouldn't consider them battlefield maps more COD maps or modes within battlefield like TD or KOTH that don't or shouldn't have vehicles. We are talking about the larger actual conquest maps that should have more than the current 1 per side which you said was balanced.

Now forgive me if im wrong but your either arguing with yourself saying that more than 1 is ok now or your just a nutcase who has no **bleep**ing clue what so ever! Also to say a game is **bleep** just because it is 20 years old is proof that your a **bleep**ing **bleep** and don't deserve anymore of my time responding to such drivel!

Good day sir! May your pillow be forever warm! 

4 air vehicles and 6 ground represent 25% of the population of the server in vehicle (with gunner).That's fair.

Again I think that all the battlefield with 33-50% of the map playing around vehicle was fun only for peoples inside. Yes tank are not god like but they are clearly strong. I played tank several times and we destroyed the ennemy team, all main battlefield streamer playing the game said also that tank are very powerfull if well used. I also played engineer and I found a lot of way to destroy it, but without the feeling where tank/jet/heli are everywhere like for BF2042.

I would be interested in having a community poll about what they expect from vehicles. In any case, in my circle the opinion is that : 25% of the players is enough.

I understand if everyone is only on vehicles flying then use this 

M142 SAM VEHICLE

Tank in battlefield 1 was :

slow, difficult to move, easy to kill (2 artillery shot), need a lot of people inside, vision was low.

No heli, horse was so easy to kill ... Plane was very limited in term of impact comparing to all other BF and was destroyed on 5 second by DCA.

Behemot is another topics which was used to balance game with a stomp and not so hard to destroy. When I say not vehicle oriented it means that they are not broken.

BF4 / 2042 are vehicle oriented. And player playing vehicles where near to impossible to counter. They have Mobility, repairing tool, anti missile system a lot of weapon, distance. Etc.

Distance exactly i was driving the tank in the mountain map on battlefield 6 and it felt small i got to C so quick, this is just a EA money grab to steal cod players, this isnt battlefield, go and play rush on battlefield 4 and you'll have more fun than you do here, this is a amalgamation of insurgency sandstorm and call of duty ground war, not battlefield  

Ok now I know your full of **bleep** or don't have a clue, BF 4 had possibly one of the best balances in all the battlefields. It was fun to be in or out of vehicles getting kills with or against vehicles and there was plenty of means for both sides of the coin. I get how in BFCOD6 the tanks seem invincible becuase the maps are so small and if there is 5 engi's behind the tank theres no way to get them and stop them from keeping tank invincible. However this is easily solved by Dice making a change to only allow x amount of tank repair hp per second regradless of engineer count repairing said tank.